Hoffman Amplifiers Tube Amplifier Forum

Amp Stuff => Tube Amp Building - Tweaks - Repairs => Topic started by: txtune on November 05, 2020, 11:50:05 am

Title: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 05, 2020, 11:50:05 am
I am trying to find this cap. What exactly am I looking at, circled in red. Thx!
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: sluckey on November 05, 2020, 11:54:07 am
I am trying to find this cap. What exactly am I looking at, circled in red. Thx!
Looks like you found it already.   :icon_biggrin:

It's a .1µF 400V cap. Any .1µF cap that's rated for 400V (or higher) will work. Plenty to chose from. Just click the capacitors link below this message.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 05, 2020, 01:15:32 pm
I am trying to find this cap. What exactly am I looking at, circled in red. Thx!
Looks like you found it already.   :icon_biggrin:

It's a .1µF 400V cap. Any .1µF cap that's rated for 400V (or higher) will work. Plenty to chose from. Just click the capacitors link below this message.

Thanks sluckey! I am making this harder than it needs to be. My 'local' electronics store is a shop-online and then pick-up at will call type. Great place, but nobody there to answer questions like this... you folks here are the 'good side' of the internet.  :icon_biggrin:   

Narrowing down inventory to Capacitors  -> 'in stock' -> .1uF -> Above 400V = about 45 results. I can still narrow down by Manufacturer, Category (Aluminum Electrolytic, Ceramic, Feed Through, Film, Tantalum), Tolerance, Termination, Mounting, Configuration, Element Material, ESR, Case Size, Special Features, Max/Min Operating Temp, Lead Spacing, and Series.  :help:

Is the 10% referring to the tolerance?

Any brands/features to stay away from? Any to look for?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: sluckey on November 05, 2020, 01:34:04 pm
Click the capacitors link below this message. SUPPORT OUR HOST! He has to pay for this forum. It ain't free.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Latole on November 05, 2020, 01:45:49 pm
Why do you need a new one ?

I'll put this one ;

Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 05, 2020, 02:12:07 pm
Click the capacitors link below this message. SUPPORT OUR HOST! He has to pay for this forum. It ain't free.

Ok, will do. But I want it now! I will order some other items from our host.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 05, 2020, 02:13:22 pm
Why do you need a new one ?

The one in the picture is not mine.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 05, 2020, 02:41:07 pm
Click the capacitors link below this message. SUPPORT OUR HOST! He has to pay for this forum. It ain't free.

While I am shopping I am going to get some other items. Are the two resistors in my original image 470k 1/2 watt carbon?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: mresistor on November 05, 2020, 02:44:24 pm
Yes

Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Latole on November 05, 2020, 02:45:39 pm
Why do you need a new one ?

The one in the picture is not mine.

I though you are looking for a replacement.
Like yours is not available, it is not made anymore .

Look at E-Bay for a used one
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 05, 2020, 02:50:06 pm
I have the exact same amp as the one in the picture, which I am trying to mod in a similar fashion. The description (that accompanied the photo) was given as a  1uF DC-blocking cap. Being new to all of this, I wanted to make sure I was getting the correct type.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Latole on November 05, 2020, 02:55:50 pm
I have the exact same amp as the one in the picture, which I am trying to mod in a similar fashion. The description (that accompanied the photo) was given as a  1uF DC-blocking cap. Being new to all of this, I wanted to make sure I was getting the correct type.

It is not a 1 mfd it is a 0.1 mfd.
 I show you the correct replacement.

Short answer ; a 0.1 mfd 400 volts is same as any a 0.1 mdf 400 volts ( or more volts )
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 05, 2020, 03:19:48 pm
Typo on my part, it was listed as .1 ... it was the DC blocking part that confused me. Just wanted to make sure I got the right one, which I just ordered from the link below.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 05, 2020, 04:34:38 pm
Quote
it was the DC blocking part that confused me.
in week 1 of EE class you learn "capacitors block DC and pass AC"
week 2 they make you do math and amend those rules  :icon_biggrin:
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Latole on November 06, 2020, 03:03:01 am
On what amp ( or ???) do you work ? What do you want to do ?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Latole on November 06, 2020, 03:05:52 am
Quote
it was the DC blocking part that confused me.
in week 1 of EE class you learn "capacitors block DC and pass AC"
week 2 they make you do math and amend those rules  :icon_biggrin:

Or Google ;

http://www.learningaboutelectronics.com/Articles/What-is-a-coupling-capacitor

Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: HotBluePlates on November 06, 2020, 08:11:23 am
I have the exact same amp as the one in the picture, which I am trying to mod in a similar fashion. The description (that accompanied the photo) was ...

Why make us guess?  Name the amp and/or provide a link to the "description of the mod."

You would probably get a clearer answer, faster.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Latole on November 06, 2020, 08:28:43 am
It is unfortunately quite common to read on forums, people ask for specific advice without giving details or without mentioning their equipment / gear.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 06, 2020, 09:33:23 am
Quote
I am trying to find this cap.


The OP isn't interested in amps, just caps, no reason to say I have a fenderxyz when you only care about a Cap.
that IS displayed for our decoding
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 06, 2020, 09:34:03 am
It is unfortunately quite common to read on forums, people ask for specific advice without giving details or without mentioning their equipment / gear.

This is true.

And it is also true that sometimes those providing answers on forums are also not perfect.  Maybe they respond too quickly and confidently, based on incorrect understanding or incorrect assumptions about the person’s question.  Maybe they do not understand certain words or certain parts of the question, so the response they give is actually incorrect.

None of us are perfect.

One other thing to understand about the learning process: when people are beginners, they do not yet understand the context, or how best to ask their questions.  They do not yet know what information is important to provide.

Txtune provided a clear picture of the part, the part’s label, and the part’s position in a circuit.  For a beginner, that is “giving details”.  For a beginner, that might seem like all the information an expert needs to answer the question; in fact, some experts might agree.  But overall, It is not logical to assume a beginner knows how to ask questions in the best way, or in the way an expert prefers.

My own preference is to try to help people by sharing what little knowledge I have, without criticizing them for what they do not yet know how to do.

If on the other hand, the person asking the question is rude, too demanding, or otherwise impatient, then I can choose not to respond.  But as long as a person is decent, I try to help without criticizing for what they do not yet know.

These are just my opinions, which are also known to be imperfect.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: jewishjay on November 06, 2020, 11:57:34 am
sometimes those providing answers on forums respond too quickly and confidently, based on incorrect understanding or incorrect assumptions about the person’s question.  Maybe they do not understand certain words or certain parts of the question, so the response they give is actually incorrect.


AMEN
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 06, 2020, 12:56:18 pm
Thank you all for your input. My apologies to anyone who found my question frustrating.

I have a tube power amp from a Stromberg-Carlson ASR-120 Stereo. I am in the process of learning, restoring, and modifying this amp. This is my first attempt working on any real electronics. While searching the internet for information I came across a recent blog of an individual who was working on the exact same amp. The amp he started with was already modified by someone, it was an estate sale find. The author of the blog did describe the cap in question (which was not original equipment) as a ".1uF DC-blocking cap". I posted the picture here and asked for further information.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 06, 2020, 01:15:13 pm
It's a .1µF 400V cap. Any .1µF cap that's rated for 400V (or higher) will work. Plenty to chose from. Just click the capacitors link below this message.

One more question about this. The cap in the picture *appears* to be polarized, but none of the ones I purchased *appear* to be. Am I looking at that correctly?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: sluckey on November 06, 2020, 01:32:54 pm
It is not polarized. If you are referring to the black stripe at one end, that simply indicates that lead is connected to the outer foil.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 06, 2020, 01:47:38 pm
IF your brain hasn't completely dissolved from capacitance, read on  :icon_biggrin:


https://el34world.com/Forum/index.php?topic=11427.0



Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: acheld on November 06, 2020, 06:25:46 pm
OK, question:  What is the purpose of the cap in question?   Looks like it dumps AC from pin 7 of a tube to ground.

Am I reading this wrong?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 06, 2020, 06:41:20 pm
look at the right side, again
Hint: tab is give-a-way
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 06, 2020, 07:44:38 pm
What is the purpose of the cap in question?

I googled up some of the info provided throughout the thread: "Stromberg-Carlson ASR-120 Stereo" and ".1 cap" and "mod".  I got several apparently relevant results, including the following:

http://origaminightlamp.blogspot.com/2020/04/stromberg-carlson-asr-120-stereo-tube.html

If you scroll down about 2/3rds of the way through that page, you'll see what's up.  It looks to me like they're caps added as part of the mod.  The mod includes adding RCA-style inputs to the power amp. Since a person could then theoretically connect any audio source "output" to these newly-added RCA "inputs" - even an audio source that also has DC riding along with it's audio output - the DC-blocking caps were added to stop any such DC from getting in.  So the caps are in series with these newly-added inputs (and despite initial appearances, not tied to ground).

It seems likely to me that for the original, unmodified version of this stereo system, DC-blocking caps were present too, but maybe in another chassis housing the preceding preamp stage or stages (like the output of the phono preamp circuit, or whatever preceded this poweramp in the original home-stereo setup). 
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 06, 2020, 07:50:25 pm
That is the blog post I was referring to, you can see my mess in the most recent posting in my ASR120 thread here.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Latole on November 08, 2020, 08:21:05 am
OK, question:  What is the purpose of the cap in question?   Looks like it dumps AC from pin 7 of a tube to ground.

Am I reading this wrong?

Cap loog plug to RCA jack
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 10:34:01 am
So the caps are in series with these newly-added inputs (and despite initial appearances, not tied to ground).

Should I the tabs on the RCA 'inputs' have a wire going to the chassis ground?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: sluckey on November 08, 2020, 11:54:17 am
no
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 01:13:45 pm
Should the tabs be connected to anything?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: sluckey on November 08, 2020, 01:54:39 pm
They are electrically connected to the chassis simply through the mechanical contact with the chassis. Just like a screw and nut are electrically connected to the chassis through the mechanical contact. This is not a difficult concept.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 02:04:37 pm
They are electrically connected to the chassis simply through the mechanical contact with the chassis. Just like a screw and nut are electrically connected to the chassis through the mechanical contact. This is not a difficult concept.

Of course it is via the washer the tab is attached to, in fact the washer portion if making the best connection with the chassis. Why add a tab, with a hole in it for a solder connection, sticking off the side if there is no intention of making any sort of connection?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 08, 2020, 02:13:11 pm
Here is the general, abbreviated idea behind those tabs, why you do not need to connect them to anything to make your amp work as it is currently set up, and some examples of why other amps would need the tab.

The standard method to get audio signals from one place to another, is to use two wires (we can set aside shielded cable for a moment, but the idea is the same there is well).  One wire is "hot", carrying the audio signal, and the other serves as "ground". 

In your setup, your RCA jacks each have two connections, inside your amp.  One makes the connection to the wire carrying the audio signal from your source - that connection is the one in the middle of your RCA jack, to which you connected the .1 uF cap. That is how the audio signal from your source gets to the circuitry inside the amp.

The other connection, is to ground.  In this case, the RCA jacks can connect to ground in more than one way.  The method you are currently using, though it was not apparent to you, is through direct contact to your amp chassis.  If you study the RCA jack, the tab, and the amp chassis, you will see that all three are already in contact with one another. So you do not need to make a wire connection from the RCA tab, to your amp chassis / amp ground.  It is already made, through direct contact.  You could make a the connection using a wire, but it would be redundant.

If you had a plastic chassis, or the amp was otherwise set up in a different way, where chassis was not the circuit ground, then you would need to run a wire from that tab, to wherever ground was set up.

Another example where you might need that tab, is for an amp where the amp input grounds are intentionally isolated from direct connection to chassis ground at input, but get connected to ground through an intermediate point later in the circuit.  This is more complicated, and beyond my knowledge to teach effectively, but you can look up "star grounding for guitar amps" or some combo of those keywords using your google machine if you are interested.

So there are times when that tab connection would be needed.  In your case, it is not needed because the ground connection is made through direct contact.

Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 02:27:37 pm
Joel - Thank you! I knew the tab had a purpose in some configuration and you explained that perfectly.

While the speakers are working and the audio is coming through, there is a loud humming noise. I just wanted to make sure these tabs did not need to be connected somewhere to eliminate the humming sound. Any idea where to start in tracking down the humming noise? Should I start another thread for that?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 08, 2020, 02:53:08 pm
While the speakers are working and the audio is coming through, there is a loud humming noise...Should I start another thread for that?

Re: starting a new thread, maybe, maybe not.  First a few questions about the hum:

Is it a constant-pitch, low-frequency hum?  Just keeps going at one low-end pitch?

If you unplug / remove connection cables from your audio source to the RCA jacks, does the hum remain constant?

Finally, I'm guessing the answer on this one is "no", but I'll ask anyway: did you replace any capacitors in the amp?  Though not the only cause of constant, low-frequency hum in old tube amps someone is trying to revive, a common cause is faulty power-supply filter capacitors.  It looks like in your amp, the power-supply filter caps are contained in the "can" seen on the top side, near the big power transformer.  You didn't replace the power supply filter caps yet, did you?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 03:04:46 pm
Is it a constant-pitch, low-frequency hum?  Just keeps going at one low-end pitch?

Yes.

If you unplug / remove connection cables from your audio source to the RCA jacks, does the hum remain constant?

Yes.

It looks like in your amp, the power-supply filter caps are contained in the "can" seen on the top side, near the big power transformer.  You didn't replace the power supply filter caps yet, did you?

No I did not. I actually have the parts and direction to rebuild the 'can' ... or disconnect it and put the new parts under the base. I suspect that is my next order of business.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 08, 2020, 03:39:39 pm
Yes.  Though it's not certain, based on your answers there is a good chance that the cause of what you are hearing is that those electrolytic filter caps in the can are likely no longer doing their job of filtering out power supply hum.  In my opinion, if you already have the parts, you should proceed with putting in new filter caps.

Your response indicates you are already aware that there are different strategies for doing this.  It sounds like you bought three individual caps, rather than a "multi-section can" like the original part?  If yes, cool, but I hope the caps you bought are at or higher than the voltage specified for the original? 

I often replace can cap filters by leaving the "can" in place, disconnecting the wires from it, and putting new individual caps inside the chassis using terminal strips or other secure methods so that they are held in place in a solid manner, and not suspended in there just shaking around etc. by long wire connections on both ends. Many people use gobs of hot glue to keep them in place.  OK, but not my own preference - I use terminal strips myself.

Before you start: the filter capacitors can store a big DC charge, even after the amp is shut off.  It could hurt you or kill you.  PLEASE read up on how to work on them safely, before you proceed.  Use your googler to search up "safely drain tube amp filter caps", before you start on this.

After reading up on that, do two things: take a closeup picture of the connections / wiring at the bottom of the can capacitor, inside the chassis, and also take a closeup picture of any stamped text on the outside of the can, at the top. If you need help confirming hookup later, this will be necessary to share. You will often see some codes on both the bottom of the can cap (inside the chassis) and also stamped on the outside, which explain the hookup process.  For example, on the outside you might see a triangle shape, along with something like "40uf, 450 volts" and then a half-circle shape along with something like "10uf, 350 volts" or whatever.  Then inside stamped on the bottom, you might see the triangle and the half-circle, next to the connection tabs.  This all explains the correct hookup of the different capacitors.

If you were not aware, these capacitors are polarized, carry high voltage, and can be bad news if you wire them up wrong. If done wrong, there is a good chance you will have fireworks, damaged parts, and a smokey haze of the non-purple variety in your workshop.

Be careful, take your time, and do it all correctly.  This is not something to rush.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 04:31:06 pm
The 'kit' I purchased from HiFiAudio.com included the new power caps, listed below, new film caps, inrush thermister, and some other odds and ends. The included directions cover multiple techniques used to rebuild the original multi section can cap. The author also talks about putting them 'under the hood' like you mentioned. Do you have a photo you could share of your technique? Rebuilding the can looks cool, but also looks like a chore. 

C52A – 40/350 will be replaced with 47uF
C52B – 30/350 will be replaced with 47uF
C52C – 15/300 will be upgraded to 22uF
C52D – 47/100

Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 08, 2020, 04:46:10 pm
It is a pain to gut out an ol can an work in new, I would leave that til after it's running good.


did you note the original VDC of your old can?, 350vdc might be marginal for the 1st PS tap.  the 47uf 100 will work good as the cathode bypass cap on the PA tubes
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 05:08:12 pm
It is a pain to gut out an ol can an work in new, I would leave that til after it's running good.


did you note the original VDC of your old can?, 350vdc might be marginal for the 1st PS tap.  the 47uf 100 will work good as the cathode bypass cap on the PA tubes

Would you bypass it for now and put the new power caps underneath? Would a new can with the correct specs be hard to come by?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 06:19:47 pm
Was this particular can cap so specialized that none of these manufactures would still make one?

This site had some that looked close, but nothing exact.
https://www.tedss.com/Capacitors/Browse/aluminum-electrolytic-large-can-twist-lock
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 08, 2020, 06:37:26 pm
I suggest following up on one of Shooter's questions, before rushing to shop for new or different parts.  I think you might be OK with what you have, but let's verify.

You gave all specs for the original caps, but only some specs for the new caps that came in your kit.  To clarify, you indicated 47uf, 47uf, 22uf, 47uf for the replacement caps.  That is the capacitance of each capacitor in your kit - it means 47 micro farads, 22 micro farads, etc.  Those specs seem fine.

But what about the voltage of each?  Please take a look at each of the caps in your replacement kit, and let us know the voltage on each. In particular, we're curious about the big 47uF caps. 

The schematic of the power supply found at the link below, indicates that C52 - the first filter cap after the 6CA4 rectifier tube - normally sees 320 volts DC.  It probably sees more than that at startup, and given today's higher household AC compared to the past, it might see more than that throughout regular use.  So a 350 volt capacitor in that position might be OK, or it might be cutting it a little close.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lGXMf-1Cew4/Xod0ekJn5DI/AAAAAAAADis/3nMcauGiPVwDt18GE2wM65Lsgw933ql5ACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/ASR-120Power.gif

It would be nice - maybe not even a deal breaker, but nice to know - that the replacement cap for the first position, is at a higher spec than 350 volts.  Please let us know what you see for voltage specs, on the replacement caps themselves. 

About stuffing the can versus getting the amp working, I think Shooter means that you could probably get the amp in good working order first using what you have - including replacing these filter caps - before eventually deciding whether you want to stuff new caps into that old can, or shell out the additional possibly unnecessary money to buy an original-spec can.

As we have been discussing, there are several ways to do this right, from a functional standpoint.  But there are choices you can make based on preference.  Among your choices: (1) You can pull the can right out of the chassis, which takes some time and effort, and leaves a hole in the chassis which you probably have to plug up.  Then you can install the new caps, using a few possible approaches.  (2) You can leave the can in place, which gives you the same look from the outside view, up top.  The amp looks the same from the exterior, in other words, because you're leaving the can and it's internal caps, in place.  But then underneath, you install the new caps, using a few possible approaches.  (3) You can do all the work to empty the can, stuff the new caps in, and wire them up.

I like choice 2, myself.  It lets me preserve the amp's original look from the outside, and tends to be less work than the other two options.

You could try choice 2 to see if you get the amp working well.  You already have the parts that should likely work.  Then if you start feeling fussy later and really want to hollow out the can, or shop for a similar can with close to original specs, you could. 

I use terminal strips, when implementing option 2.  You mount them under the chassis, often somewhere near the bottom of the can caps you are updating.  Then you can appropriately solder the new caps and existing wiring that went to the can cap, to the new terminal strips you have installed.

Hoffman (sponsor of this forum) sells terminal strips - scan this page:

https://hoffmanamps.com/MyStore/perlshop.cgi?ACTION=enter&template&thispage=BoardBuilding&ORDER_ID=!ORDERID!

Take a look at the 5-terminal options.  Without thinking about it too much, or verifying for sure, I would think if you came up with two of those, you could install the caps in your kit just fine. 
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 08, 2020, 07:06:34 pm
the 1st tap needs to be 450vdc
I know you already spent $$, but your 4 cap can, can be replaced by;


https://hoffmanamps.com/MyStore/perlshop.cgi?ACTION=enter&template&thispage=Capacitors&ORDER_ID=!ORDERID!


look at the JJ can at the bottom.
If you opt for that option, get the clamp


otherwise on that page find a single 47uf 450vdc or more to use for tap A, then use yours for B-D


IN the power supply VDC takes priority over uF
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 07:17:00 pm
Joel - I really appreciate you taking the time to respond in such depth and with absolute clarity and patience. Shooter and Sluckey have both helped out a great deal,  though I must admit, sometimes it feels like I am asking for motorcycle riding lessons from the Hells Angels.   :laugh:

I will post all of the specs (of the new caps from the kit) tomorrow after I get to the shop and get the guys lined out for the day. The incomplete specs I posted were grabbed from the PDF that came with the kit. Unfortunately I do not have everything in front of me at the moment, we live in a small condo in a tall building and I have no real work space... I also don't have to mow a yard, so I can't complain *too* much.

Keeping the can for the 'vintage' look is not important. If it can be done great, if not, that will be fine. I just want to get this amp to operate safely, sounding good, and cleaned up for it's second life.

The original cabinet that housed this power amp belonged to my grandparents. It was in bad shape and was being tossed out, I managed to salvage this amp, the tuner, and the turn table. Building a small tube amp kit has long been on my 'to-do' list. When I salvaged these parts it seemed like the perfect starter project... heh... wrong!
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 07:20:34 pm
the 1st tap needs to be 450vdc
I know you already spent $$, but your 4 cap can, can be replaced by;


https://hoffmanamps.com/MyStore/perlshop.cgi?ACTION=enter&template&thispage=Capacitors&ORDER_ID=!ORDERID!


look at the JJ can at the bottom.
If you opt for that option, get the clamp


otherwise on that page find a single 47uf 450vdc or more to use for tap A, then use yours for B-D


IN the power supply VDC takes priority over uF

Thanks Shooter! I am going to post some pictures of what I have on hand, and then go from there. I did indeed spend mucho dinero, and a lot of money too, on the rebuild 'kit'.. live and learn.   
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 07:29:34 pm
Shooter - The 40x20x20x20/500V JJ cap and the clamp below it would be a direct replacement for what the one I have? Would I drill the hole out and put it where the current cap can is? I already have some items in the basket, so if this is a slam dunk I will go ahead and order it. I would rather spend money the money here anyways.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 08, 2020, 07:46:36 pm
I would guess right now, though obviously cannot guarantee, that the replacement caps in the kit you purchased are spec'd at 450 volts or higher.  So yes, once you have them in-hand, check out the voltage specs and let us know.  Both sets of specs - capacitance/farads and voltage - are usually labeled clearly on the exterior of capacitors of this type. 

Separate topic, but something to keep in mind.  When I look at the schematic below, it seems this amp is happiest with a 2-ohm speaker load:

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-E_0PnHJqYQ8/XoZqOM3NCNI/AAAAAAAADg8/Ml04hE7wf8E3Py8O9NTxBheEk3z7Tk4UACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/ASR-120.gif

After each output transformer (labeled T2 and T3 on the schematic), the diagram shows a 12" speaker and a 6x9" speaker in parallel (we can ignore for now the bass-blocking 2.0 micro farad capacitor in series with the final 3x5" tweeter).  So my guess is, those 12" and 6x9" speakers are each 4-ohm speakers; once in parallel they present a nominal 2-ohm load to the transformers.

You mentioned testing with some bookshelf speakers.  Take a look at the back - does it say they are 8-ohms?  If yes, you might consider figuring out a way to get together a 2-ohm speaker load, or even 4-ohm which would probably be OK.  For example, you could wire up two 4-ohm speakers in parallel to get 2 ohms, or two 8-ohmers to get 4 ohms.  If you have to continue testing with 8-ohm speakers, it might be alright but I recommend testing at low volume; don't go crazy cranking the volume with a speaker load mis-matched by 4 times the original spec.

Finally, as you may have heard, you should not feed a tube amp a signal, without speakers connected.  That is bad news.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 08, 2020, 08:03:14 pm
Just saw your follow-up to Shooter re: JJ can cap. 

First, I agree with Shooter that it will most likely work well from an electronics standpoint.

Buy it if you like. 

But it is not a "direct replacement", as you said.  That JJ is a wider-than-usual can cap, so you might have to widen the big hole that the can sits on top of, so all the can cap terminals can remain clear from the chassis; that is no picnic, unless you have the right tools (chassis punch of the right size is best; could also do it ugly with metal nippers, or semi-ugly with a roto-tool and a grinder attachment, etc.).

Also, as mentioned, you might not need it at all if the caps in your kit are on spec for voltage, and I bet they are.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 08:09:05 pm
I am glad you brought this up. The speakers I am using are Klipsch KG 1.2 model from the early 1990s. They are indeed 8 Ohm speakers.

Is there an inexpensive small/mid speaker that is 2ohm? Probably not, let me see what sorts are online.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 08, 2020, 08:24:49 pm
I want to revise one of my previous statements:

I would guess right now, though obviously cannot guarantee, that the replacement caps in the kit you purchased are spec'd at 450 volts or higher.

I should say instead that I would bet at least one of the 47uf caps is spec'd at 400 volts or higher.  The other caps in the kit could be at lower voltage specs, and that could be OK, because some caps in that can saw lower-voltage parts of the circuit. 

So I stick by my previous request - let us know what voltage specs you see printed on the various caps themselves, and we can advise as to whether or not they are safe to use.

You asked about availability of 2-ohm speakers, likely of the hi-fi type.  I don't follow hi-fi stuff very closely, so I can't answer well.  But I would guess you would have a hard time finding new-manufacture 2-ohm hi-fi speakers. Do you still have the original speaker drivers from the console?  You could put those in some new cabinets, if you're not going to keep the console itself.  I would bet the console speaker enclosure areas were "open back", so you wouldn't have to fuss around with special porting, calculating box size, etc.  If you just put the speaker drivers, as-wired now, into new boxes with a semi-open back, you'd probably be fine.  One other point - modern book shelf speakers are not usually very efficient (low relative SPL).  Those old speakers in the console were probably pretty high SPL (but much lower wattage handling).  So using those old speaker drivers will make your amp sound louder than most modern bookshelf speakers.

OK, I have to stop writing for the night.  Hope some of this helps.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 08:25:02 pm
That JJ is a wider-than-usual can cap, so you might have to widen the big hole that the can sits on top of, so all the can cap terminals can remain clear from the chassis; that is no picnic, unless you have the right tools (chassis punch of the right size is best; could also do it ugly with metal nippers, or semi-ugly with a roto-tool and a grinder attachment, etc.).

Good point.

I have a hydraulic knockout tool with various sizes, but I was thinking a step drill bit would be best. We have some that go up to 60mm - 65mm. The step bits that fit 1/4" electric impacts are super.

It looks like there is plenty of room around the current opening, just looking at the photo. I will check it out tomorrow. 
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 08, 2020, 08:26:56 pm
Unfortunately the original speakers did not make it out alive.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 09, 2020, 07:25:36 am
Quote
Is there an inexpensive small/mid speaker that is 2ohm


how will you use them?
your amp's OT are rated 6k:4-6ohm speaker, so anything from 4 to 8 ohm will be fine



Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 09, 2020, 07:44:17 am
Oh, ok. If that's the case I will leave these little bookshelf speakers in place.

Here are the caps I have. I also ordered the large JJ cap (and clamp) that you said suggested.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 09, 2020, 09:59:14 am
About the speaker ohms: thanks Shooter, and my apologies txtune - I think I gave you bad advice, because I misread the schematic at the link below:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-UcEyD24KcAw/Xod0QhIPUjI/AAAAAAAADio/oxWl4JnNprYqR9nZbanNHWbbG-vRfVHygCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/ASR-120Audio.gif

I saw "2 ohms" noted on the secondary side of each transformer.  But when I took another look after Shooter's post, I now think it may actually say ".2 ohms" with a decimal.  Either way, I see now that it also specifies "110 ohms" on each half of the primary side of the transformers too, so I'm guessing now they were just specifying normal resistance readings for trouble-shooting, so you can test to see if the transformer windings are blown.  In other words, that "2 ohms" or ".2 ohms" I see on the schematic was not specifying the appropriate speaker load, it was telling you what your meter would read for resistance, if the transformer is in good working order. 

About the caps in your picture, based on the power supply schematic at the link below, they should work.  You have to install each one in the right part of the circuit, and not mix them up.  But they will work. 

Power supply schematic:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lGXMf-1Cew4/Xod0ekJn5DI/AAAAAAAADis/3nMcauGiPVwDt18GE2wM65Lsgw933ql5ACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/ASR-120Power.gif
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 09, 2020, 01:42:11 pm
Quote
C52A – 40/350 will be replaced with 47uF


later you posed the cap spec sheet for the amp showing 450vdc
I just want to be sure there isn't a typo, OR wrong value cap in your "kit" before you learn what an exploding cap looks, smells and sounds like  :icon_biggrin:






Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 09, 2020, 02:13:48 pm
later you posed the cap spec sheet for the amp showing 450vdc
I just want to be sure there isn't a typo, OR wrong value cap in your "kit" before you learn what an exploding cap looks, smells and sounds like  :icon_biggrin:

Attached below is from the directions with the kit. It appears to have two differences from the cap spec sheet.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 09, 2020, 02:49:59 pm
About the caps in your picture, based on the power supply schematic at the link below, they should work.  You have to install each one in the right part of the circuit, and not mix them up.  But they will work. 

I also ordered the larger JJ cap from this site's store. In someways it seems more straightforward to me, as a beginner, to use the JJ. It *seems* like less chance to mess something up as far as wiring, what do you think?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 09, 2020, 05:52:58 pm
In my opinion, it's a pretty close call, as to which one will be easier. 

To put in the new JJ multi-section a.k.a. can cap, you will need to (1) take a picture of the bottom of the can cap wiring and other connections on your amp, for reference later as needed (2) drain the high-voltage DC from the old can cap sections (3) remove the current wiring and components from the old can cap (4) remove the old can cap from the chassis, which takes a bit of time and effort (easier if you have a higher-wattage soldering iron with a big chisel tip to heat up and twist out each of the can's tabs, but can be done regardless with metal nibblers, grinder on a Dremel, etc.) (5) install the clamp you bought for your new JJ can cap (6) install and carefully and correctly wire up the new JJ can cap.

To use the individual caps you bought in the kit, you will need to (1) take a picture of the bottom of the can cap wiring and other connections on your amp, for reference later as needed (2) drain the high-voltage DC from the old can cap sections (3) remove the current wiring and components from the old can cap (4) plan and implement a method to secure the new individual caps in place - like I said, I use terminal strips, bolted in place inside the chassis; others use hot glue or other goop (5) install and carefully and correctly wire up the new caps.

Up to you which way you want to go here.

While you are waiting for parts to arrive, there are a few things I'll point out now, that you'll want to come back to later.

The smallest cap from your kit, is marked Nichicon (that is the brand) and 47uf, 100v.  My recommendation (more on this below) would be to use that one regardless of the choice you make above.  The 47uF 100v cap was to be used as the cathode bypass capacitor for the power tubes, and is not part of the power supply filtering we have been talking about so far.  But you might as well replace the old part that corresponds to this one too, while you are replacing the power supply filter capacitors housed in the can.  We can come back to this later, but I'm just bringing it to your attention.  If you go with my recommendation below, you'll want to use this small one, regardless.

Second, if you decide to use the JJ cap, note that it has four capacitor sections: 40uf, 20uf, 20uf, and 20uf, all at 500v, right?  You need three high-voltage caps, with the original being specified as 40uf 450v, 30uf 350v, 15uf 350v.  There is also a 50uf 25v cap specified on the schematic and parts list - that could be replaced with the Nichicon 47uf 100v mentioned above (from your kit).   

So my recommendation would be to use your new JJ cap in the following way to best meet the need: wire up two of the 20uf sections in parallel.  This will make your JJ cap have 40uf at 500v (to replace C52A, 40uf 450v on the schematic in the parts list), 20+20 = 40uf at 500v (to replace C52B, 30uf at 350v on the schematic in the parts list), and 20uf at 500v (to replace C52C, 15uf at 350v on the schematic in the parts list).  This will meet or exceed all of the specs of the original power supply filter caps in the can.  Finally, to replace C52D from the parts list, you can use that small Nichicon 47uf 100v, that came in your kit.  That can be handled separately; we can come back to it later.

There are other ways to proceed, but this is my advice right now anyway.



Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 09, 2020, 06:06:38 pm
That definitely gives me something to think about until the JJ arrives, which is the one I would like to install.

I will take, and post, some really good pictures tomorrow of the inside where the can is attached. The amp has been sitting unplugged since Saturday, but I will check it and drain it, if there is still a charge on it. Then I will start the process of removing it.

While I am at it I might go ahead and clean out any wires that are no longer needed. Is it safe to remove the wires attached to the plastic molex-esque plug that used to attach to the tuner? What about the small plug in the front dead center? Is that where a volume control was once connected?? Could I replace that with something to control volume?

Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 10, 2020, 09:03:39 am
Quote
Is it safe to remove[/quote
Only You can prevent amp fires  :icon_biggrin:
while you're waiting, use the SCHEMATIC and layout, trace the wires you want to "cut", if they "exit" the amp, didn't get used for testing to this point, they can probably go.  Ask if you get stuck in in a loop  :icon_biggrin:
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 10, 2020, 09:48:36 am
while you're waiting, use the SCHEMATIC and layout, trace the wires you want to "cut", if they "exit" the amp, didn't get used for testing to this point, they can probably go.  Ask if you get stuck in in a loop  :icon_biggrin:
[/quote]

The wires going to the plug, circled in red, are not connecting to anything now nor will they in the future. Unless they are connected inside the plug, I don't see how they could be necessary any more.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 10, 2020, 09:56:03 am
Here are some up closeup photos of the cap can. The markings on the can match the spec that I posted, and DO NOT match what the 'kit' directions stated. So that is cleared up.

I clamped onto the chassis ground with my negative lead and then tested each of the four terminals on the inner portion of the can. I got roughly 237vdc on three and 0vdc on one. I discharged the cap, checked again to make sure it was safe... my meter seemed to be slowly charging them back up... so I discharged them again and let it sit.

Before I remove it, does all of that sound about right?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: shooter on November 10, 2020, 10:49:16 am
was 237vdc with tubes?


pics are great, use them all the time, but making your own sketch (printed pic works), noting wire colors, where they go, what components n values go with what wires "completes" the circle


Your meter will always charge caps, put that in permanent brain storage for later use  :icon_biggrin:
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 10, 2020, 11:04:25 am
was 237vdc with tubes?


pics are great, use them all the time, but making your own sketch (printed pic works), noting wire colors, where they go, what components n values go with what wires "completes" the circle


Your meter will always charge caps, put that in permanent brain storage for later use  :icon_biggrin:

No, tubes were out at that point... and checked again, they were closer to 250vdc. I drained them, reconnected and verified back up to 248ish. Then drained them with power off, cord unplugged. Sitting there waiting for the word to start removing it.

I found these old soldering guns, not sure if they would be any help removing the large cap can.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: sluckey on November 10, 2020, 11:21:02 am
Your 100 watt gun may do the job but will probably be slow going. I use this gun for stuff like that...

     https://www.amazon.com/Weller-D550PK-260-Watt-Professional-Soldering/dp/B00002N7S1
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 10, 2020, 05:27:14 pm
Here's how I would proceed.

Use a c-clamp or two to secure the chassis in an upright position to your workbench, table, or whatever.  Best if you can secure it in a place and manner where you can reach both sides of the chassis.  While not absolutely necessary, this approach will be helpful to you, I think.

Remove the wiring and components attached to the old can.

Then get ready with a pair of pliers, a flat head screwdriver (not your favorite - pick one you can abuse), a heat-resistant glove (leather OK, oven mitt OK, thin cotton jersey glove probably not OK), and both (yes both) of your soldering guns heated up and ready to go.

If you look at the bottom of the can, you can probably see that it attaches by metal tabs that were pushed through the chassis, then maybe twisted and/or bent, and then soldered in place. 

Your job is to simultaneously keep those blobs of solder heated enough, while working the corresponding tab with the screwdriver and/or pliers, until you can break off the tabs and/or free them each up enough to pull the can out and away from the top of the chassis.  That's what the glove is for - put it on the hand that will grab the can from the top, wiggling and pulling at it while heating the solder tabs underneath.  You might have to work each tab a little at a time, freeing one side of the can a little, then the other - repeat as needed until the can is free.

To get the tabs hot enough, I would start by using both guns on a tab for a while.  Hit a tab first with all 175 watts.  After the solder flows and it all seems good and hot, drop the smaller gun on a safe surface, keep the 100-watter on the blob/tab as much as you can, while using your free hand to do the work described above.  If the solder starts freezing up with just the 100-watter, re-heat with both guns again for a bit, as needed.

Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 10, 2020, 05:53:26 pm
Your 100 watt gun may do the job but will probably be slow going. I use this gun for stuff like that...

     https://www.amazon.com/Weller-D550PK-260-Watt-Professional-Soldering/dp/B00002N7S1

Ordered one. Should arrive the same day as the JJ cap. Thx.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 10, 2020, 05:55:20 pm
Here's how I would proceed.

Sounds like fun. I will have another set of hands helping out... also went ahead and ordered the larger solder gun that Sluckey linked above.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: PRR on November 10, 2020, 06:07:54 pm
Everybody can wear glasses/goggles. Molten solder can splatter. On the skin, hurts, but you heal. In the eye, not so good.

Do as I say, not as I do.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: sluckey on November 10, 2020, 06:28:33 pm
If you own an oscillating multi-tool or a dremel with cutoff wheel, just cut the 4 tabs loose from the can on the top side of the chassis. Then you can easily desolder the individual tabs one at a time with no sweat.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 10, 2020, 06:31:52 pm
txtune, it seems you're ready to buy whatever people advise.  That's cool - there are lots of smart people here, with lots of experience, and good advice. 

I generally like finding ways to get it done with what I have.

But if you feel like spending, you could also consider one of these, which will make this can removal, and most future de-soldering jobs, easier:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0002KRAAG/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_D8YQFbJE7WXRE?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

You don't have to have it.  You will succeed without it.  But it makes de-soldering jobs easier, cleaner, and faster.

Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 10, 2020, 06:45:28 pm
txtune, it seems you're ready to buy whatever people advise.  That's cool - there are lots of smart people here, with lots of experience, and good advice. 

I generally like finding ways to get it done with what I have.

But if you feel like spending, you could also consider one of these, which will make this can removal, and most future de-soldering jobs, easier:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0002KRAAG/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_D8YQFbJE7WXRE?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

You don't have to have it.  You will succeed without it.  But it makes de-soldering jobs easier, cleaner, and faster.

I don't necessarily buy everything that someone on a forum suggests. With that being said, I do like having the correct tools for the job. I bought a desoldering vacuum last month, I did not get the most expensive one I could find, but I got a decent one... I have no regrets.  I have wasted more money buying items without asking for advice first than the other way around. 
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 10, 2020, 06:50:41 pm
If you own an oscillating multi-tool or a dremel with cutoff wheel, just cut the 4 tabs loose from the can on the top side of the chassis. Then you can easily desolder the individual tabs one at a time with no sweat.

I have a dremel, let me give that a go in the morning.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 11, 2020, 08:51:27 am
Well, that was fairly painless. Hopefully I can figure out how to connect the new one! I took a lot of pictures and also left short pieces of wire connected to the can to help identify what was connected.

Should I go ahead and replace all of the resistors that were connected to it? Both the large and small ones?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: mresistor on November 11, 2020, 12:37:50 pm
What is the outer diameter of that cap can?
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 11, 2020, 03:27:31 pm
What is the outer diameter of that cap can?

The can itself is about 35mm and the band/collar at the bottom is closer to 37mm
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: mresistor on November 12, 2020, 07:03:35 am
You might have to open up the hole a bit for a JJ 40/20/20/20 cap can. At least in a couple areas where the can terminals locate. I'd also use heat shrink tubing to insulate the terminals after connection if they're in close proximity to the metal chassis. You can space the can up a tad off the chassis with that clamp too.  That is IF you are using the JJ.  :icon_biggrin: 

Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: txtune on November 12, 2020, 05:21:09 pm
Second, if you decide to use the JJ cap, note that it has four capacitor sections: 40uf, 20uf, 20uf, and 20uf, all at 500v, right?  You need three high-voltage caps, with the original being specified as 40uf 450v, 30uf 350v, 15uf 350v.  There is also a 50uf 25v cap specified on the schematic and parts list - that could be replaced with the Nichicon 47uf 100v mentioned above (from your kit).   

So my recommendation would be to use your new JJ cap in the following way to best meet the need: wire up two of the 20uf sections in parallel.  This will make your JJ cap have 40uf at 500v (to replace C52A, 40uf 450v on the schematic in the parts list), 20+20 = 40uf at 500v (to replace C52B, 30uf at 350v on the schematic in the parts list), and 20uf at 500v (to replace C52C, 15uf at 350v on the schematic in the parts list).  This will meet or exceed all of the specs of the original power supply filter caps in the can.  Finally, to replace C52D from the parts list, you can use that small Nichicon 47uf 100v, that came in your kit.  That can be handled separately; we can come back to it later.

Attached is the bottom of the old can, I pushed the tabs out from the center and was able to find the markings you were talking about. 

Then I cleaned up the chassis a bit, I am kind of limited to what I can do without taking the entire thing apart.
Title: Re: Cap ID
Post by: Joel in Texas on November 12, 2020, 05:41:08 pm
Looks good txtune.  Congrats on getting it out.  When your JJ can comes, I think it will have letter-based labeling, instead of the little shapes you probably found as markers on the old can.

You asked whether you should replace the resistors, or re-attach them to the new caps in the JJ can you have coming.

That depends on a few things.  First, for reference, here again is the schematic:

http://www.audiophool.com/Schem_A/S-C_ASR-120_schem.gif

From your pics, the smaller ones that look like striped brown tubes are small-wattage (1/2 watt, I think) carbon composition resistors.  The one with red-red-red-silver is a 2.2k-ohm 1/2 watt resistor, and I think it corresponds to R60 on the schematic.  The two with yellow-purple-brown-silver are each 47-ohm 1/2 watt, corresponding to R61 and R62 on the schematic.  Carbon comp resistors are relatively delicate, compared to other types of resistor formats - they are more prone to damage from overheating, and more prone to simply break from jerking them around by the leads during installation or removal.

The three bigger ones that look like rectangular bricks of cement are higher-wattage cement power resistors.  They tend to be more durable physically, but they also tend to see a lot of power / heat from the circuit, so they can degrade over time regardless (definitely not always, but it happens).  For these, you have a 100-ohm at 10 watts (R58), a 2.2k-ohm at 5 watts (R59) and a 150-ohm at 10 watts (R63).

In all cases, it looks like their wire leads got clipped a bit during removal, as opposed to heating up the connections and working the leads out with pliers.  Both approaches are valid, but if you choose to clip the leads short rather than work the leads out of the connections to preserve the length, it means you might have to replace rather than re-use.  Alternatively, you can extend the shortened leads with new wire that is substantial enough to take the current.

Do you have a meter?  If yes, you can measure the resistance of each.  If they measure within 10%-20% of the specified resistance, they are probably OK from a circuit-functionality standpoint.  But there is still the question of whether the leads are now clipped too short to work with.

If you choose to buy replacements, see above for your parts list.  Remember you need to specify both the resistance (ohms) and the power handling (watts) when ordering.