> two 220K resistors and two (?) 220uf/350v caps. What are those for?
I don't know, but suspect, that the B+ here can rise over 450V.
Ordinary electrolytic caps only go to 450V. If you go over that, the cap blows-up.
(Film-caps and special production e-caps are available in higher voltage but at higher prices.)
When you need a large cap for over 450V, it is often economical to stack two caps in series.
Two 220uFd 350V acts like 110uFd and maybe 700V.
"Maybe", because there is no assurance the voltage will split exactly 50:50. The voltage split is related to cap DC leakage. Caps have a spec for maximum leakage but are often much better than spec. You could pick up two "identical" caps, one leaking 100uA and the other leaking 10uA. The voltage would then split about 10:1. At 500V, maybe 50V on the more-leaky cap and 450V on the less-leaky cap. That would be bad for 350V caps.
Actually as the voltage rises over 350V, the less-leaky cap leaks more. They tend to equalize. But this is not assured, and the one cap will be hovering too close to its blow-up rating.
Two equal resistors will split voltage equally. 220K across say half of 500V is over 1mA or 1,000uA. Any little 100uA difference in cap leakage is overwhelmed by resistor current.
Note that these 220K resistors will idle at 0.3 or 0.4 Watts. For "forever" life you want to double-size: 1 Watt.
Yes, the entire "Presence" network on the schematic is missing from the layout. Exercise for the Student: figure out how much was omitted, move-over half the layout so you can fit-in the overlooked parts. If you are very unsure, leave 3 rows of blank turrets and then install the parts. I suspect it will be very much less than 3 rows. In a bind, I would air-wire 390r and 2uFd on the back of the pot. But that's less road-worthy.
There is an error on the schematic, PT HV secondary. The 50V tap is shown dotted (connected) to the 350V(?) winding. That will be a quick smoke. There should be a cross-over here.