Pdf64 If interpreted as you have, if nominal is ~81 (which is actually 70% if I am correct)...
The nominal Vg1 in that table is -80V?
Note that both the June 1961 and Dec 1972 GEC KT88 info show the same 'typical operation' for fixed bias UL 560V HT 4k5 p-p load 50mA p+g2 idle current as now having an approx Vg1 of -75V.
With the plate and g2 at 550V, and plate + g2 current at 50mA, the total idle dissipation looks to be 27.5W, which works out to 67% of the 'plate + g2' max rating. Unfortunately the actual plate current isn't separated out, and the ratio of 'g2 current to plate current' tends to increase as plate current increases but at these idle levels it's reasonable to assume the plate dissipation is also around 67%. Which is a long way of saying yes

...You say adjustable between 52 and 87?...
Just to be clear, -70V +-25% works out to -87.5V at one extreme and -52.5V at the other.
...I’ve run the Major over 90 on old tubes...
Sorry, do you mean that your amp idled at 90% plate dissipation or at -90V grid bias?
...I’ve run the Major over 90 on old tubes and Ritchie even higher (or lower!) on an amp designed by the THIS tube manufacturer...
Yes, thanks, assuming that was 90%, it lines up with JUne 1961 and Dec 1972 MO/Genelex/GEC KT88 info (previously linked to), which shows 'typical operation' table for fixed bias non UL with 560V HT as idling at 60mA plate current; that works out to 33W = 94% of the 35W plate rating!
...Is it coincidence tho that the nominal figures stated by the manufacturers work out to ~70%?...
No, if the designer's goal is to get high AB1 power at reasonable distortion, using a typical tube HT supply with a bit of sag, then the idle operating point tends to result in an idle plate dissipation of around 70%.