It's really difficult to understand the circuit from your photos.
I think you're better off attaching a schematic and drawing in your proposed change.
Schematics and photos go together like butter and toast. Both are good, but together they are . . . great!
Am pretty sure now it doesn't matter which way I wired those resistors. Either one would work. There are elements of each of them on the Fender 5f6a schematic as highlighted on the attached picture. In reply one I split the 82K and 100K resistors as per the schematic. However I sent the power from the dropping resistor to the 100K resistor whereas the schematic has it attached to the positive end of the ecap and the junction of the 100K and 82K caps.
So the best thing to do if I want this to be identical to the Fender schematic is to reconnect both of the ends of the 100K and 82K resistors to the ecap which is right in the middle and leave the 4.7K dropping resistor also attached there and I will be consistent with the schematic. The Hoffman layout had the ecap tied directly to the 100K resistor and then running to the 82K resistor. The schematic showed the ecap running directly to the 82K resistor and then over to the 100K resistor. In the end it doesn't matter which of these ways it is done.
However, I am going to send the power from the 4.7K dropping resistor to the ecap like I have it now and will go back to going in both directions to the 100K and 82K resistors because I like the symmetry of it that way and I am supported by the original Fender schematic for what that is worth.