> There are 3 primary taps on the transformer.
It's not a choke-y choke.
The raw 265V has ripple. Some of this ripple flows toward the 6V6. A small inverted copy of this ripple flows to R33 and then to screen and driver. If the tap position is *critically* selected, for the circuit action, ripple is cancelled. Nearly.
RCA had a patent on this scheme, and used it routinely, and made a few bucks licensing it to other radio makers.
I have never seen it done on a guitar amp. In today's economics another RC filter on the B+ will drop ripple way down without critical adjustment.
What he said. Snip and tape the brown lead, feed screen filter direct.
> the winding ratio ...seems to be 50:1 .That means the impedance is 2.5k righr?
The impedance ratio, righr. And yes, 3.2/4 Ohm speakers were common, and that makes 8K. 6V6 can take many load impedances, if you adjust V and I. But save your brain.
"Can I use this OT?" Yes, obviously. Any radio is a Tuner and a Power Amp. Omit the tuner, you have a Power Amp. RCA's engineers were no fools, the power amp is fine. With just one small tube in front of the big tube, gain is low for guitar, you will want another stage. If you are hacking a radio, this can be one of the IF tubes. If you cut the whole thing up, then picture a Champ and fade-in the RCA output section. RCA aimed for 3 Watts, whereas Fender ran the 6V6 hotter for 5W-6W. Otherwise there's about no difference.
This re-creation will "work" but the high resistor values will shave 5KHz. Good for AM radio, less-bright for guitar. I would lean more to Fender driver values.