Welcome To the Hoffman Amplifiers Forum

September 07, 2025, 06:17:38 am
guest image
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
-User Name
-Password



Hoffman Amps Forum image Author Topic: Reflected Impedance  (Read 3171 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mwelch55

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Reflected Impedance
« on: September 15, 2021, 12:49:02 pm »
I built an amp a while back with an output transformer primary impedance of 6.6K.   This is similar to the Trainwreck where you can use EL34, 6L6, 5881, or 6V6 without any bias adjustments.  The bias is within range regardless of which tube I use.

My favorite tube to use in it is the 5881. It has a beautiful breakup when overdriven.  When I install the 6V6s, the bias is still in range, but the breakup is not as nice as the Tung Sol 5881.

I was thinking that the 6.6K primary impedance is slightly above the ideal load for the 5881, but slightly below the ideal load for the 6V6.

I decided to see what would happen if I plugged my 16-ohm cabinet into the 8 ohm jack of my amp with 6V6s installed.  Now the 6V6s breakup nicely.

The way I see it, plugging !6-ohm speaker into 8-ohm output jack makes the reflected impedance 13.2K, which is slightly above the ideal load for a 6V6.  That is the same degree of mismatch as when I use a 5881 and plug 16-ohms into 16-ohms.
It sounds great.  I built this amp 2 years ago and I am just now discovering this.

Will this hurt my amp?  Is my thinking correct?

Mike

Offline Williamblake

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 483
  • I just picked values that I've seen in other circu
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2021, 01:26:13 pm »
Lower power output tubes need higher load to work on. You can probably take this much further but never get beyond "sounds nice". Guessing you didn't draw a schematic. 

Offline mwelch55

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2021, 01:58:42 pm »
Here is the schematic with voltages.

Offline mwelch55

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2021, 02:12:13 pm »
Tung Sol 5881s need around 4K primary impedance and the output transformer is 6.6K.  I think this is what gives it the nice breakup when overdriven.

6V6s need around 8K primary impedance. I thought that a reflected impedance of 13.2K would be about the same amount above the  ideal 6V6 load as using 6.6K with a 5881.

Mike

Offline brewdude

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 191
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2021, 02:29:03 pm »
“Needs” seems a bit drastic to me.  The “ideal” will also vary with plate and screen voltage.

Offline Williamblake

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 483
  • I just picked values that I've seen in other circu
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2021, 02:30:14 pm »
I see you like distortion with low cut. How about a sound clip?

Offline 66Strat

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 603
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2021, 02:40:06 pm »
Here are Ken Rad load lines for the 6L6 at different operating points to demonstrate Brewdude's point.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2021, 02:42:30 pm by 66Strat »
Regards,
JT

Offline mwelch55

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2021, 02:44:53 pm »
I don't have any sound clips.  It sounds like the Ceriatone Chupacabra, but only about 20-25 watts. The harmonic content seems to be a little more than if I had matched the output impedance exactly.  I can use EL34, 6L6, or 5881 and they all sound good, but the Tung Sol 5881 seems to bring out the best tones from the preamp.  It was only recently that I discovered that using 6V6 with the 16-ohm speaker plugged into the 8-ohm output gave me similar results.

Can someone tell me if plugging a 16-ohm into an 8-ohm output will double the reflected impedance?

Please forgive that my language such as "needs" is a bit drastic and "sounds nice" is a bit vague and not very descriptive.  I don't post very often, so please be patient.

Offline mwelch55

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2021, 02:46:29 pm »
I understand brewdudes point and I agree.

Offline 66Strat

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 603
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2021, 03:23:00 pm »
A 16 ohm speaker plugged into the 8 ohm jack will provide a reflected impedance or 13K2 ohms.
Regards,
JT

Offline mwelch55

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2021, 03:36:45 pm »
Thank you.  That's what I thought, but wanted to confirm.

I wanted to make sure before I went much further with this.  I know that if the mismatch is too far in one direction, I am in danger of damaging the OT.  Since the reflected impedance is 13.2K and "typical load" for a 6V6 is 8K, that is not much of a mismatch.  I think I'm safe.

Offline 66Strat

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 603
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2021, 03:52:09 pm »
You may want to consider bumping up the screen resistors to 2K2 ohms or so. The screens will draw more current at the higher load. The added resistance will help to protect the screens when the amp is overdriven.
Regards,
JT

Offline mwelch55

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #12 on: September 15, 2021, 04:31:45 pm »
Thanks JT.  Nice tip.  I'll do that.


Offline PRR

  • Level 5
  • *******
  • Posts: 17082
  • Maine USA
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #13 on: September 15, 2021, 05:52:48 pm »
The tube does not have a "preference" but it has limits and a bias point.

360V on shared 250Ω cathode resistor sure looks like it puts 6V6 over its thermal limit and may demand more peak current than a 6V6 can give.

Double impedance reduces the peak current problem but are you sure it is not over-dissipating 6V6es at idle?

Offline mwelch55

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #14 on: September 15, 2021, 06:09:13 pm »
I haven't checked in a while, but if I remember correctly, the 5881 was about 85% and the 6V6 was about 100-105%.  You are right, I should check it again.

Offline Williamblake

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 483
  • I just picked values that I've seen in other circu
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Reflected Impedance
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2021, 01:33:57 pm »
So are you happy? There is no such thing as bad sound clips. You can dial in lots of distortion and sustain with your circuit, i am guessing. Why not put the cathode bypass cap at the dc follower on a switch, too? Maybe you wont like it but i think it is worth a try.

 


Choose a link from the
Hoffman Amplifiers parts catalog
Mobile Device
Catalog Link
Yard Sale
Discontinued
Misc. Hardware
What's New Board Building
 Parts
Amp trim
Handles
Lamps
Diodes
Hoffman Turret
 Boards
Channel
Switching
Resistors Fender Eyelet
 Boards
Screws/Nuts
Washers
Jacks/Plugs
Connectors
Misc Eyelet
Boards
Tools
Capacitors Custom Boards
Tubes
Valves
Pots
Knobs
Fuses/Cords Chassis
Tube
Sockets
Switches Wire
Cable


Handy Links
Tube Amp Library
Tube Amp
Schematics library
Design a custom Eyelet or
Turret Board
DIY Layout Creator
File analyzer program
DIY Layout Creator
File library
Transformer Wiring
Diagrams
Hoffmanamps
Facebook page
Hoffman Amplifiers
Discount Program


password