Has rectifier tube quality declined over time? Probably, maybe even most likely, but that's irrelevant as there are plenty of recently produced rectifier tubes operating just fine in better implementations of standby.
I would say it is relevant to a customer without technical knowledge, that has purchased an expensive amplifier to play, where the manual tells him to warm up the amplifier in standby before every use.
When considering the cause of a failure in such an amplifier, whether it be the circuit (including standby position), or a weak rectifier tube, this does become a consideration.
I don't disagree about bypassing use of the standby switch altogether.
The quality of rectifier tubes is relevant to me and I have an interest in any thoughts on the matter, having now spoken to tube suppliers and tube amp manufacturers about the issue.
If the Sovtek factory is in Saratov, Russia, which just yesterday was being hit with drone strikes, the factory is certainly at risk. Not to mention the men from the factory floor being seconded into the military.
If, for example, a Vox amplifier blows four Sovtek rectifier tubes in quick succession, but runs well with a JJ tube, what does that suggest to you? (an anecdote relayed to me by a tube suppler).
In the specific case of the amplifier I am working on, I think it would be prudent to measure the heater and HV secondary pins of the rectifier, to see exactly the voltage demands placed on the tube.
I think it's all relevant...