Hoffman Amplifiers Tube Amplifier Forum

Amp Stuff => Tube Amp Building - Tweaks - Repairs => Topic started by: kagliostro on May 25, 2017, 03:56:55 am

Title: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: kagliostro on May 25, 2017, 03:56:55 am
Planning a new transformer for a circuit where the Power Tube require a lower voltage than B+

Think to tubes like GU50 - EL500 - 807 and so on

A tap to the correct AC voltage is planned on the PT and ....

is correct this rectify plan ?

(http://i.imgur.com/IiA51OL.jpg)

Thanks

Franco



Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: chocopower on May 25, 2017, 07:20:21 am
I´m using this.




Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: kagliostro on May 25, 2017, 07:30:08 am
Ciao David

Unfortunately, for me the link didn't work  :dontknow:


Franco
Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: jjasilli on May 25, 2017, 09:37:57 am
This is a theory intensive question on Transformer & circuit design. I believe your proposed circuit, with a tap, will function.  You could go UL; or separate PT winding; or some circuit to drop B+ to the screens.


 FWIW:  The Stromberg Carlson APH-1100 is a 100W mono PA power amp, using PP KT88's:  600V plate, 300V screen.  It accomplishes this with a separate screen winding on the PT (not a tap).  (It also uses voltage doubling on both the plate & screen supplies.)  It sounds great for hi-fi with 5% THD @ 100W; 2% THD at 80W, from 20 - 20,000 Hz.
Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: DummyLoad on May 25, 2017, 10:04:44 am
see attached - g2 node (C3) will be approx 1/2 B+ node (C1). the example attached was designed for a pair of 6550. plates are 520V and g2 is 260V.


--Pete
Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: PRR on May 25, 2017, 10:42:59 am
Or without the frills, just this.
Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: kagliostro on May 25, 2017, 11:21:58 am
Many thanks to ALL

I belive all of you is right

I'm just arrived at home and walking around I was thinking to the circuit

If the G2 voltage is to be 1/2 of B+ I'll accomplish with you about the use of the CT as the G2 supply, like in this old Philips PA amp

(http://i.imgur.com/15NtYAi.jpg)

But in some cases datasheet council is different, so an 807 at 350v B+ is to have 250v G2 and only 200V G2 if B+ is 500V

If I use a "standard" PT we have largely discussed how to obtain the needed voltage (PRR planned for me a Mosfet circuit to lower B+ to the exact G2 requirement)

But if I build my own transformer why not use a specific plan ?

So, walking, I've think to this solution (the previous I posted put on me the idea it is unsafe)

(http://i.imgur.com/YazPCaR.jpg)

Do you think this will be the right way to have G2 and B+ independent values forom each other ?

Thanks


Franco


p.s.: Jjasilli the Stromberg Carlson APH-1100 schematic is missing on Doug's database

if you have it, please post it so he can add it to the database


Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: PRR on May 25, 2017, 11:28:28 am
That will work.

Since G2 power is much less than P power, it may make sense to just have dedicated windings. Especially if you wind your own. Then you can change the turns on the G2 winding without re-thinking and re-winding the P winding. Some of the big Ampegs did it this way. (VT40 with distortion feature)
Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: kagliostro on May 25, 2017, 11:37:46 am
If I understand correctly you PRR

you say that I can use a "sum" of the two windings voltages to supply the Plates

or have two windings that can feed, one the G2 and the other the Plate, without the necessity to stack them

100v + 200v staked

or

100v and 300v completely separated

Correct ?

Franco

You remembered me also Hiwatt has a similar circuit

(http://i.imgur.com/vgJgbr6.gif)
Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: jjasilli on May 25, 2017, 01:45:12 pm

p.s.: Jjasilli the Stromberg Carlson APH-1100 schematic is missing on Doug's database . . .   if you have it, please post it so he can add it to the database

Here's the whole service manual including schematic. I find these old manuals to be very instructive.


I've not been successful at getting Doug or other sites to post this schematic.  Maybe someone can get it done.


I have other Stromberg Carlson materials.  But, this is the best site for Stromberg Carlson:  http://www.audiophool.com/ (http://www.audiophool.com/) with lots of other things, including references to sites for transformer design & theory which may interest you.
Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: kagliostro on May 25, 2017, 01:55:44 pm
Many Thanks Jjasilli

Now I think Doug will add it to the database

Franco
Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: chocopower on May 25, 2017, 04:29:29 pm
Ciao David

Unfortunately, for me the link didn't work  :dontknow:


Franco


Sorry. Try now.
Title: Re: Planning PT for tube w low voltage G2 request - Is this rectify schem correct ?
Post by: kagliostro on May 25, 2017, 06:31:12 pm
OK David

now I can see, thanks

Franco