... Hammond suggests a PP tranny for SE application in one case, see Hammond website you might find the thread ( 125 vs 125SE ). ...
Where I could read what hammond said about that ? I can't find it. I want to learn.
I can't find it either.
What I
do find is on the
push-pull 125 page, Hammond directs you to their 125SE page if you need a single-ended transformer.
On the
single-ended 125SE page, Hammond directs you back to their push-pull 125 page if you need a push-pull transformer.
Maybe you read through their pages too fast and didn't notice the ending on the (otherwise same) part number?
Comparing similar parts between those products, the 15w 125E weighs 1.5 lbs, where the 15w 125ESE weighs 3 lbs.
Double the core to get the same power handling at the same frequency response. That highlights what I keep saying, which is that the unbalanced d.c. in the single-ended circuit requires a bigger core (and an air gap) for the same power output and frequency response. Because the push-pull circuit does away with the unbalanced d.c. and thereby reduces the standing magnetic flux in the transformer, a smaller core can be used for the push-pull circuit.
So if you go backwards and use a push-pull transformer for a single-ended circuit, you will be able to pass less usable power through the core, because the unbalanced d.c. and its magnetic flux is taking up some of the core's capacity. It's not that you
can't do it, but you won't get 50w of SE power through a 50w push-pull transformer.
... unless you use parallel feed, but that wasn't the point you were making ...