At TAG someone suggested a 1M or thereabouts R at the screen supply leg of the switch, bridging it to the screen R/switch common. what do you think of that?
The pentode/triode switch (for a single tube) is a SPDT switch: The screen (and screen R) is the switch common (center lug), the screen supply node (for pentode operation) is one outer lug, and the plate/OT connection (for triode mode) is the other outer lug.
So I'm thinking they mean a 1MΩ bridging from one outer lug to the other, or between the two settings that the screen is switched. I don't think that would do anything.
Alternatively, they may mean a 1MΩ from each outer lug to the screen node, so that the switch is shorting a high-valued resistor. This
might reduce popping to/from the pentode setting. I'm not sure it will do anything for the triode setting (but that may be irrelevant). The concept is that the high-valued resistor provides a charging path for the filter cap to minimize current in-rush.
I dunno if adding the resistors will help. But they won't hurt anything and are cheap and easy to try.
... Also, if someone ever borrows the amp, I donīt want a control in it that has the potential to blow up the amp or the power valves...
I don't believe you have to worry about that.
The switch arcing is internal, and causes an unnerving loud thump. With repeated arcing, there is an increasing chance that a carbon track is formed between the arcing contacts. Once that carbon track is sufficiently established, the switch will be shorted internally between those contacts, and will seem to stop working properly.
The net result should be a permanently shorted switch that needs replacing to regain functionality. I don't see an obvious failure mechanism that could harm the tubes or the OT.