There are leakage #'s on the manufacturers spec sheet. You could see if your measurements line up with theirs?
I don't have a # to give you but this is something to consider;
I built this cap forming rig and did some experiments with it.
http://www.electrojumble.org/reforming.htmI used a variac and started with ~50dcv on the 450v cap in the rig. I would measure the leakage with the 1st dcv applied and write it down. Then after an hour or so I'd re-measure, write it down and then up the dcv again. I kept this up for 4 to 6 to 8 hours depending on the caps uF value and it's leakage #'s. These were all new caps.
Each time I upped the dcv, say another 50dcv, I'd remeasure and the leakage had gone way back up again, not all the way but still a lot, maybe 50% to 75%. It would jump the most at the lower dcv's and each time geting closer to the max dcv rating it would jump back up slightly less % wise. After a while you get a feel for when you need to up the dcv and when the caps leakage is as low as it will get.
I could get it down to a very low amount of leakage compared to where they started and the leakage chart on the link. I seem to remember that I got the leakage down to at least ~1/2 and maybe as little as 1/10th of what was listed on the chart?
But they won't stay that way as they sit unused, no dcv applied. Caps reform as you use them with the applied dcv.
So you'll get a different leakage measurement from any cap new or old that hasn't had a dcv applied to it in a while, the longer it has been the more leakage will probably be measured. (And older caps are drying out with age, heat and use so they will leak more and more as time goes on.)
Because of improvements in materials and manufacturing techniques, (most) new caps are made
much better then the cap of the 50's, 60's, 70's, etc. So your way ahead of the game to start with.