Resistance readings mean almost nothing at all with reverb tanks, and transformers. The ohms refers to AC impedance ... The only thing a DC resistance tells us is ...
You're not entirely wrong.
But we know DCR is some percentage of actual Impedance, which PRR uses to generate an estimate:
The 170r coils suggest 600-1K audio impedance ...
And then 2deaf uses to figure out the corresponding Accutronics part number:
It's the equivalent of a 4FBxxxx for direct drive reverbs. Won't work for transformer driven reverbs.
When we go to Belton's website, they provide a
PDF with the DC Resistance of input and output coils, along with the corresponding AC Impedance. This in turns confirms PRR's and 2deaf's estimates.
There's nearly no info on this "module", unless you know more than we do. The supply specs do suggest op-amps.
5 years later, it was a home-run or a strike-out. But those specific brackets were used to vertical-mount tanks in Hammond organs. I don't know which model got this specific tank, but I suspect it was used to siphon a small % of a many-watts speaker-output to directly drive the tank, then applied the tank's output to another amplifier to drive a dedicated reverb-speaker.
Guitarists frequently find this particular model available for little money, and get hopeful it will work in their amp. Then they find it has "weak reverb" because the higher impedance input isn't being driven a such a large signal as found in the original application.
Not that I've fallen victim to this exact scenario... you know... just sayin'.