I love circuits that use bias-vary tremolo inserted on the grid of a power tubes in a push-pull amp! Is there any reason Not to use a similar circuit on a single ended amp? ...
That method isn't used, as there's no way to avoid the modulation signal being amplified by the power tube and flapping the speaker like crazy.
There's no logical reason to inject bias-vary trem at the output tube of a single-ended amp; you should save yourself much trouble and just wiggle a preamp tube cathode like a
Vibro Champ or a
Vox amp.
You
can do it like the GA-1 RVT. Drawbacks are speaker-flap (and pulsating background noise), and injection at the output tube requires a big signal from the oscillator.
>
May be tremolo connected to G2 of the Power Tube ...This could be done, but there is less-gain from G2 to plate so the oscillator signal must be
even bigger (nearly as big as the output tube plate signal.
The connection to the grids of push-pull output tubes to vary the bias was an idea
Fender patented and introduced in the tweed Tremolux amps. The point is to get rid of pulsating background noise by adding the trem at a point in the circuit that normally responds to push-pull signals. Those amps varied the bias of a shared cathode resistor in a phase inverter, but when Fender later changed phase inverter circuits the same idea could be applied to the output tubes. The downside is, as above, bigger signals are needed from the oscillator to vary the bias of output tubes (10's of volts) than in the bias of preamp tubes (~1 volt).
You're looking to forgo the push-pull noise-cancelling nature of the Tremolux, brown Deluxe or blackface/silverface Princeton amps by running single-ended. That being the case there's no reason I'm aware of the you should make the task harder by requiring your trem oscillator to deliver a larger output signal. Might as well make the trem circuit easier by varying the bias of a preamp tube.