Welcome To the Hoffman Amplifiers Forum

September 06, 2025, 04:38:33 pm
guest image
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
-User Name
-Password



Hoffman Amps Forum image Author Topic: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?  (Read 4360 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dwp

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 644
  • am addicted to iron........
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« on: June 18, 2010, 01:19:33 am »
I have a Super Reverb 4X10, was full repro build, MM iron, (2ohm output only) now that i've converted to 5F6A, the amp does not get real loud. I thought it may be because it was driving 4X10's, but not the case. I have another 5F6A build, MM repro iron also except tweed, 2X12, just tonite I swapped speaker loads, the tweed is very loud on three, the SR 5F6A goes to 8 to equal.
QUESTION: was it a reproduction function of the 60's Super Reverb to not have "high" output OT? In hindsight it was the same case as AB763, not super loud, but I thought it might have been the nature of the circuit/bias trem, etc. (Hoffman AB763)
     All voltages are normal, 470-ish and on down, bias set at 35MV, output tubes swapped, no difference, Amp sounds good, have been playing over an hour, on 8, normal heat from the PT and tubes, OT not hot.
     Is there some way to check my OT other than just replacing it? Or has anyone else experienced a Blackface repro OT that just doesn't dish it out?
Thanks in advance, dwp

Offline HotBluePlates

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 13127
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2010, 05:46:07 am »
... now that i've converted to 5F6A, the amp does not get real loud. ... just tonite I swapped speaker loads, the tweed is very loud on three, the SR 5F6A goes to 8 to equal.

Was the amp's volume right when it was the Super Reverb circuit? I can't speak to replacement OT's, but I used to own a blackface Super Reverb and can tell you it is every bit as loud as the 5F6A.

More important to the evaluation of volume: are both amps roughly the same audible volume when they start to distort? This is not an issue of volume knob setting; does essentially a similar volume come from the speakers?

The 2 amps have different circuits, but similar output stages. They should create essentially the same clean volume output, given the same output number and type of tubes, same number of speakers and similar phase inverter and feedback. But the placement of the tone circuit and the fact that it is driven by a cathode follower in the 5F6A leads to somewhat less loss in the tweed circuit's preamp.

That could account for some discrepancy of volume knob setting. Another would be the type of pots used. What kind of pots are in each amp? Are they different? If you have a linear-taper pot for a volume control, almost all the volume change will seem to occur up to about 3 on the knob. From 3 to 10 (12?), there will be almost no volume change, but possibly only a distortion change. If you use a log pot, the volume will seem to change smoothly and "linearly" from 0 to 10. Yeah, it's hard to remember that a log pot will do this, because the name is different from the effect, unless you remember that human hearing responds logarithmically.

But there is more than just 1 kind of log pot. Most that you come across are 10% taper. Measure the resistance between the outside lugs, then rotate the wiper up halfway and measure from the center lug to the ground lug. You will read about 10% of the total resistance at 50% rotation. A linear pot will show 50% resistance for 50% rotation.

Some manufacturers use a 30% taper log pot. The resistance increases faster, and gives 30% resistance at 50% rotation. The effect is that the amp is louder on 2-3 than another amp with a 10% taper on 5-6. Because the taper is faster, the voltage is divided differently and the volume rises in a hurry. But at the top end of the rotation, there is very little volume change, and it can even seem like the amp runs out of "headroom" as some folks say. It really has nothing to do with the circuit performance, only the pot taper.

Come to think of it, I have a tweed Deluxe copy that has, I think, 30% taper pots. I'll have to go in and swap them out for 10% taper pots. Tweed Deluxes distort early on the volume knob, but I might get some wiggle room with a part change. The WeberVST pots are 30% taper. Others, you'll have to check a distributor with full info in a catalog or webpage (like Mouser, Newark, Digikey, etc) to see what the specified taper is.

Offline dwp

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 644
  • am addicted to iron........
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2010, 07:27:30 am »
... now that i've converted to 5F6A, the amp does not get real loud. ... just tonite I swapped speaker loads, the tweed is very loud on three, the SR 5F6A goes to 8 to equal.

Was the amp's volume right when it was the Super Reverb circuit? I can't speak to replacement OT's, but I used to own a blackface Super Reverb and can tell you it is every bit as loud as the 5F6A.

thanks HPB. In Hindsight, I'm thinking maybe it was not as loud as it should have been as AB763..

More important to the evaluation of volume: are both amps roughly the same audible volume when they start to distort? This is not an issue of volume knob setting; does essentially a similar volume come from the speakers?


Definitely NOT! The SR 5F6A doesn't distort. Without blending both channel Volume Pots. The Tweed 5F6A distorts just above 4.

The 2 amps have different circuits, but similar output stages. They should create essentially the same clean volume output, given the same output number and type of tubes, same number of speakers and similar phase inverter and feedback. But the placement of the tone circuit and the fact that it is driven by a cathode follower in the 5F6A leads to somewhat less loss in the tweed circuit's preamp.

my circuits are identical after the conversion of the SR.

That could account for some discrepancy of volume knob setting. Another would be the type of pots used. What kind of pots are in each amp? Are they different? If you have a linear-taper pot for a volume control, almost all the volume change will seem to occur up to about 3 on the knob. From 3 to 10 (12?), there will be almost no volume change, but possibly only a distortion change. If you use a log pot, the volume will seem to change smoothly and "linearly" from 0 to 10. Yeah, it's hard to remember that a log pot will do this, because the name is different from the effect, unless you remember that human hearing responds logarithmically.

I use 1M Audio, CTS pots, usually. Now I will check though to see if they're the same brand on both.

But there is more than just 1 kind of log pot. Most that you come across are 10% taper. Measure the resistance between the outside lugs, then rotate the wiper up halfway and measure from the center lug to the ground lug. You will read about 10% of the total resistance at 50% rotation. A linear pot will show 50% resistance for 50% rotation.

This I did not know. I will investigate, CTS as opposed to CGE? that would be the only two brands on 1M A's, Alpha mix on the other values.

Some manufacturers use a 30% taper log pot. The resistance increases faster, and gives 30% resistance at 50% rotation. The effect is that the amp is louder on 2-3 than another amp with a 10% taper on 5-6. Because the taper is faster, the voltage is divided differently and the volume rises in a hurry. But at the top end of the rotation, there is very little volume change, and it can even seem like the amp runs out of "headroom" as some folks say. It really has nothing to do with the circuit performance, only the pot taper.

Come to think of it, I have a tweed Deluxe copy that has, I think, 30% taper pots. I'll have to go in and swap them out for 10% taper pots. Tweed Deluxes distort early on the volume knob, but I might get some wiggle room with a part change. The WeberVST pots are 30% taper. Others, you'll have to check a distributor with full info in a catalog or webpage (like Mouser, Newark, Digikey, etc) to see what the specified taper is.

Oops, forgot to add, I do have Tubenit's latest reverb add on the SR conversion, via the 100K resistor at the PI, but I am pretty sure I had the same condition before I added it.
Also the EF 86 in front channel. But compared to an identical build I have here with 4 6V6, the SR conversion still not as loud.
     Also, after over an hour of steady playing last night at band volume, the PT was hot, entire chassis at that end, but this heat could be normal from Output Tubes, Yes? PT is drop-in, OT further away, bolt on, no heat to speak of. Any more takes on power consumption, OT health?
Thanks again, dwp



Offline RicharD

  • SMG
  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 2057
    • Toxic Water
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2010, 09:39:53 am »
How do the 2 feedback networks compare?  Sounds to me like the quieter amp has significantly more NFB.  Just guessing.

-Richard

Offline dwp

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 644
  • am addicted to iron........
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2010, 10:48:34 am »
I have the same values on both for presence control. When I get home today I'll read and post voltages. I do have some stuff I didn't mention above, like the Reverb, a Master Volume, EF 86 channel, but I also have the same exact build mostly complete that rocks the volume, lower.
     Was mainly getting at does anyone think I could just have a defective Output Transformer? Or anyone experinced similar issues where it was the characteristics of the Output Transformer? Has been this way probably since I got it, both builds, lack of maximum drive.......So far answer no?
     It also does have good tone, no noise issues, no accidents in it's history. Never had anything but intermittent house use.
thanks again, dwp

Offline HotBluePlates

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 13127
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2010, 07:47:49 am »
Was mainly getting at does anyone think I could just have a defective Output Transformer? Or anyone experinced similar issues where it was the characteristics of the Output Transformer? Has been this way probably since I got it, both builds, lack of maximum drive.......

Not likely. If the transformer were defective, it would likely be shorted turns or a wrong number of turns. If you move away from optimum loading for the output tubes, you get less power, more distortion, or less power and more distortion. So that's probably not your issue.

I agree that you'll want to triple check the series feedback resistor running from the OT secondary; too much feedback will do what is described.

So will a way too big tail or bias resistor in the phase inverter. Look for simple errors like 470k where a 470 ohm should be (yellow and brown look an awful lot alike on Xison carbon comp resistors).


Offline dwp

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 644
  • am addicted to iron........
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2010, 09:10:19 am »
hey I can't find the post voltages link, here's a snapshot then. All values are correct around the NFB.
Am reading 11VDC going to prescence pot.
NFB 27K resistor, is correct that I can only read 3.6K with resistor installed, yes?
am only getting a one volt drop across the choke. (487/486VDC)
am only getting three volt drop at primarys, center tap OT (487/484VDC)
see below. plate and screen same voltage on OT mean anything? am used to seeing a 3-5 volt differential.

tube bias set at 37MV

thanks again for the review.

am thinking about changing the skirted knobs out next. Chicken heads are louder.......

Offline HotBluePlates

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 13127
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« Reply #7 on: June 20, 2010, 01:12:51 am »
NFB 27K resistor, is correct that I can only read 3.6K with resistor installed, yes?

If you measure across the 27k resistor, the meter leads also see the presence pot as a parallel path through the OT secondary and ground. Assuming the presence pot is all the way down and the feedback resistor is exactly 27k, you would see something like 4.2k and less for any setting of the presence pot above 0. So you're good.

am only getting a one volt drop across the choke. (487/486VDC)
am only getting three volt drop at primarys, center tap OT (487/484VDC)
see below. plate and screen same voltage on OT mean anything? am used to seeing a 3-5 volt differential.


Not really.

Do you have an as-built schematic for your amp? It's gonna be hard to guess where there's an issue with the extensive changes from the stock circuit.

How would an old radio guy troubleshoot this? 3 possible ways, one of which is probably too expensive.

The expensive way is to tack in a known good OT. This is not expensive for a repairman that happens to have one sitting around waiting to be used. The 2 cheaper ways are to use signal tracing and/or signal injection.

Signal tracing would be applying a signal to the input jack from a signal generator of some kind, and using some sort of test equipment to check for the signal as you move from input jack to output. The equipment could be a meter or it could be Hoffman's handy listening amp.

Signal injection is using a signal generator (sometimes capable of a quite high output voltage), and applying a test signal at various points in the amp while observing/listening to the output. You work from the output tubes back towards the input jack, and do not apply a signal to the input jack itself.

Either one of those methods would probably localize the area of the trouble, since you could compare a known good amp to your problem amp. They would find the issue a lot faster as well. If you used a new OT in the build, it is very unlikely to be bad in and of itself. There's a lot of circuitry between the input jack and the OT, and it's more likely that there is a wiring, solder or part value error in that area. But applying steady test signals that could be measured and compared between amps would probably sort this out well, since there's no obvious dead stage.

Bottom-line, and maybe your best option with no extra gear: you have a bum amp and a known good amp, both with the same circuitry (true?)... What's different between them? measure and find it, and you found your problem.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2010, 01:14:55 am by HotBluePlates »

Offline dwp

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 644
  • am addicted to iron........
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2010, 01:46:53 pm »
http://www.el34world.com/forms/valvedata/SR%20EF86.htm

Hey found the Tube Data page, entered the voltages, note the change.....(20Volt drop in B+, same output tubes and setting at 35MV)
BUM AMP? That's alittle harsh don't you think? (lol)
What started this thread was the night and day difference in volume control, compared to another Tweed 2X12 5F6A build, side by side. And the fact that I just converted this 4X10 to 5F6A, with EF86, and reverb, and I am giving it to my wife's son for his Birthday this weekend coming up. Am trying to make it bullet-proof, he's not the amp tech type, yet.
     So the only thing I really found was a bad 1MA volume pot, and it spoke to me, it failed, shorted signal when turned off, made loud amp noise, where it wasn't doing that before. And I re-mounted the PT, I used to install all horizontal PT's to the chassis without lifting out the insulating bushings, was told by MM that this is wrong, isolate the screws, but not the iron. And in doing that I had to remove the top bell cover, wouldn't fit in the SR chassis.
     It was never true BUM, it sounded good, just not as ball-zee, not as fast.
     Thanks HPB, someday I will have all the necessary tools of the trade, learn the math, learn .SCH for posting drawings.
     SO why did my b+ go from 484 to 465 overnite with same Output tubes, same settings? (oops, split the cathode on V-1 too, was tied to common 820/250 before)
Thanks again, dwp
     

Offline Tiny_Daddy

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 2690
  • Get your Amp N Gear!
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Repro Output Xfrmr wound for less output?
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2010, 01:52:30 pm »
The B+ can drift around due to changes in mains voltage. The transformer is a step-up and so changes in mains voltage get stepped-up too.

 


Choose a link from the
Hoffman Amplifiers parts catalog
Mobile Device
Catalog Link
Yard Sale
Discontinued
Misc. Hardware
What's New Board Building
 Parts
Amp trim
Handles
Lamps
Diodes
Hoffman Turret
 Boards
Channel
Switching
Resistors Fender Eyelet
 Boards
Screws/Nuts
Washers
Jacks/Plugs
Connectors
Misc Eyelet
Boards
Tools
Capacitors Custom Boards
Tubes
Valves
Pots
Knobs
Fuses/Cords Chassis
Tube
Sockets
Switches Wire
Cable


Handy Links
Tube Amp Library
Tube Amp
Schematics library
Design a custom Eyelet or
Turret Board
DIY Layout Creator
File analyzer program
DIY Layout Creator
File library
Transformer Wiring
Diagrams
Hoffmanamps
Facebook page
Hoffman Amplifiers
Discount Program