Well, RCA's seem to command the highest price on the used market, and thus would seem to be the most desired.
I have always had great luck with Sylvania tubes. The garage of doom yielded a considerable pile of NOS JAN Sylvania 6L6GA which I plan to match in the matcher I am building and will theoretically finish one of these days. Also a pair of RCA 6L6G and a pile of metal 6L6s. Those can go into power supplies as pass elements. There are 2 or 4 of them in parallel and they can be weakish, emission wise, with no worries. Long as they aren't gassy and don't short out!
Ken-Rad = GE, unless you are talking very, very old.
Never heard of Transvision.
I am not that sure what you are worried about. If they test as new, or very good, state that they test very good, and that's that. Hey, you can buy brand new Russian 6L6GCs for $5 each and have them turn out doggy.
There is NOTHING wrong with rebranded tubes. ALL manufacturers rebranded some types, yes, even the mighty RCA.
Perhaps the larger concern is that 6L6G are theoretically not capable of taking the highest of high voltages in an amp designed for a 6L6GC or GB. Dissipation wise, they are nearly as good, but IIRC their ratings are 100 volts lower than GC's.