> Not much use for power amp plates though
Actually it was often mis-used to anti-regulate power tube screens.
You want XX power a dollar cheaper than the other company bidding the school sound system.
You use cheap tubes then raise the plate voltage, but if screens are high and loading is bad they conduct way too much and die. Service call, tech-pay, truck gas, bad trip.
Use cheap tubes and high B+, then drop the screens down a constant 150V. Just for example, 400V plates and 400V-150V= 250V screens. On normal load it meets spec. On excess load the high load current sags the B+, say 400V to 320V. The screens now drop to 320V-150V= 170V. This large 250V:170V drop in screen voltage severely limits plate current. The sound is awful but the choked-up tubes don't die.
It makes an amp which will just-barely meet an exact spec, but faint when asked to do anything more. Good for clean un-clipped speech/music systems. Terrible for stage guitar amps which MUST overload GRACEFULLY.
> used in guitar amps to control excessive B+?
What is "excessive"?? Too much is almost enough, we always want MORE!
The wise designer can scale for pretty good power with acceptable tube life for any normal wall-voltage variation. An unwise designer can kill tubes with regulated voltage.
As a regulator, the 0D3 and kin waste more than they deliver.
As long as filter caps are large (to slow B+ variations lower than audio tones) and you are not running at the edge, there is no advantage to regulated power voltages, and real disadvantages.
They also hiss and oscillate.
They are handy in precision meters. My Boonton ACVM's needle might vary 4% for B+ from 130V to 200V. Instead it started from 300V into a big hot resistor onto a gas tube for a steady 150V, only some of that available to the meter amplifier. Since the amp only drew a few mA, this was acceptable.