Perhaps I'm looking at this the wrong way or not doing a good job of explaining what I'm after. Probably both.
I am not looking for more gain which is what a tweed champ or princeton will bring . When fender came out with the 6G2 princeton they kept the same tone stack as the 5F2-A and it was a push/pull 6V6 fixed bias with a NFB loop. More output and cleaner sound . Around the same time they were cleaning up the sound of the SE champ and seemed to reach this using the BF vol/treb/bass tone stack .
My 6G2 /5E3 is by no means high gain even without the NFB . I also changed the bias on the 5E3 power section to a adj/fixed bias instead of the cathode bias , like the 6G2. One other thing , this build was gainy when I had a 12ax7 preamp , when I changed it to a 12ay7 preamp like the 5E3. It's very loud and tons of bottom and clean until you really crank it up like past 7 .
What I was trying to do was get that sort of sound out of my AA764 champ build , now wondering if I should try a 12ay7 in the champ , see what this does and then if needed to open it up more change the tone stack like that of the 5F2-A or 6G2 , same thing . Yet if the Champ being a SE amp perhaps it is not that adaptable. Looking at the BF tone stack compared to the 5F2-A the 5F2-A has a .02uf coupling cap off the plate before the simple tone stack to the grid of the second gain stage. On the BF stack this cap is not needed , seems the preamp plate has to flow through caps whcih are varied in value dependant of the position/resistance of the tone pots so in some sense what the BF stack seems to me to do is vary the coupling cap value before the signal reaches the grid of the second gain stage. The mid is fixed , then there is the 100k slope resister that seems to set the freq of the bass pot so due to the path the plate signal travels it is a loss of gain. Does that sound close to true?
You can change gain by tubes and/or componants.