That's not good news. The PT is not able to even supply the 4 EL34 tube filaments. It could possibly be a bad EL34 but not likely. With it connected like this and monitoring the filament voltage, pull one EL34 and see if the voltage increases. If not, pull another. Etc, etc, until there are no EL34s plugged in.
If it appears the PT is bad, then if you have another PT that can supply enough current for 4 EL34s, temporarily wire it in. If the filament voltage now reads correctly for the AC string and the DC string, the Carvin PT is bad.
1. I've confirmed the EL34s are good. I test power tubes and 12ax_ types individually in a modified champ circuit, not a tube tester.
2. Monitoring the filament voltage, I pulled one el34 at a time and sure enough the voltage rose. When all el34s were removed, voltage between pins 2 and 7 had risen to a little over 6.3 vac.
3. The only PT I have around that can supply that much current (4 x el34 = 6 amps) is in a beat to hell and back Marshall Major I can't seem to find time to restore. I'm reticent to disconnect the secondaries on that PT because of the way that amp is put together.
4. I'm getting a Hammond 115/12.6v 20 amp PT so I'll have something to quickly do this troubleshooting procedure in the future.
Is there another good test I can do on this Carvin's PT to be sure it's bad?
That is the ac input to the 5VDC power supply for the relays. Since only one wire is connected, the rectifier is operating as a half wave recto. It'll work as is but would probably work better if both wires were connected. Not part of the filament problem though. Has anyone been hacking this amp?
I don't think anyone has mucked around with this amp. Other than what I described (clipped secondary lead), it looks bone stock. Maybe Carvin had a reason for this? Problem they addressed?