Done. There is no hum or noise whatsoever in this amp. Using the chassis as a signal ground is absolutely a non-issue.
Here's a sample:
http://youtu.be/YBYWFZSRWgAThe dual inputs can create a nice variety of clean tones. If you study the schematic the front end is nicely designed. There's a lot of tone shaping going on. The Treble inputs make a 300 Hz HP filter. Channel two has 2 pole HP filter and both Volumes make HP shelving filters. The Tone controls make LP filters and are mixed together with big grid stoppers. It kinda looks like the front end of the 59 Plexi circuit but with more high passing.
Strangely the kit came with 250K pots instead of 500K which is going to shift things up slightly more. I asked Watts about the change but received no response. The kit also came with two extra caps (1n and 33n). In theory I suppose you could use the 1n in place of one of the 500p and then that would compensate for the change in pot value.
The output of this amp is unusual. It's not the usual PI. I can't say the 6973 tubes sound different from EL84s for example. Strangely this amp is not as loud as an equivalent EL84 circuit. My other tube amp is a DSL401. I'm not really into shredding anymore so I've been plugging germanium circuits into the return of the DSL401 so that I'm just overdriving the last tube, the tonestack and output. So that would be fairly similar in terms of gain. And yet the DSL401 is considerably louder. I have a home made T-attenuator circuit with a big CPU heat sink on it (you can see it in the video) and it gets super hot with the DSL401. But with this Supro 24 amp, it doesn't get that hot. But that's good AFAIC. I like to mic the amp and listen to it with filtering, compression, reverb and so on so I don't want too much bleeding through the headphones.
If you're looking for something to overdrive, this is not the amp for that. I put a Rangemaster circuit in front (which sounds really cool into the return jack of the DSL 401) but with the Supro, it's iron-y and shrill. Even without overdrive it doesn't sound good to really jam on the strings. OTOH if you are good at controlling pick attack, muting with your palm, and generally controlling pressures, this amp has great response. It feels good. If I had to pick an iconic tone to compare this to, I would say it's a lot like a good GD concert recording.
Regarding Led Zeppelin, if you want your amp to sound like Jimmy Page, you are going to have to have Jimmy Page come over and play it for you. However, if the rumors are true, and this is the circuit used to record Led Zeppelin I, I don't hear anything in this amp to dispute that. I think a lot of the heavy Page sounds are the Fuzz and maybe also the Wah. Note that even though I don't think this amp sounds good overloaded, the Fuzz (or Tonebender or whatever) actually does not overdrive the input as much as you might think. If you look a the output of a Fuzz circuit, the pot only taps a small portion of the total output swing. In fact, the Fuzz is actually limiting the output swing to a couple hundred millivolts whereas if you really jam on your guitar, it can put out a couple volts. I have to wonder if some iconic Fuzz sounds were actually recorded direct (Reellin' In The Years solo). A really good Fuzz (which are virtually impossible to be had these days BTW) can sound really good listing to it direct. So if the Supro is just used to provide "clean" character, it would all make sense ...
Mike