If you haven't built anything with the classic Fender reverb circuit in it, I would HIGHLY suggest you try it.
For me, it's a must in a clean amp and makes the amp much more enjoyable to play.
As DL suggested above, AB763 is a must try, and is considered by most here as the holy grail circuit.
Well I'm glad my last junk gear purchase included a reverb tank then.

Yes, the 6L6s seem like a very clean amp compared to the little 6V6, 6BQ5/6AQ5 circuits I've been playing with.
So the 6G3 shows a tremolo circuit added to the bias, but the main idea is just a reversed diode tap with a few RC filter and dropping stages to get the proper - bias voltage range. This bias voltage uses little to no current, except in those dropping resistors, correct?
A ballpark guestimate of the mA of current draw this adds to the HT tap? I suppose this is dependent on the B+ voltage.
It seems as most GC circuits run at around +450, and my older G or metal 6L6 circuits at +380 or less.
The Airline design, with it's +380 B+, worked for all my metal 6L6s, of which I have the most, and 6L6G tubes.
And when I put my only 2 6L6GCs in there I couldn't hear any difference between all 3. Clean but not quite as powerful as I was expecting for this output wattage.
Is the higher B+ desired more for output power or as I had read a decrease in odd order harmonics generated?
I have a number of PT's that could work. A few that could do +500 or more with SS rectification.
Some with 5 VAC taps and some without, but none with that specific - bias tap.
Then the other decision tube or SS. To get a true representation of a circuit's sound, I supposed it is necessary to follow the PS design exactly.
Or is this sag and other effects of tube rectification barely noticeable to newbies like me?
