Well, I was recapping one of the these beasts recently and when I went to bias it in. I was shocked that the power tubes are pulling about 12ma a piece. Well I thought, maybe adjustable fixed bias would be a better option. I changed the bias balance to more of an adjustable topology. I changed to a single feed to the bias supply grid resistors to 220K (they were 47k and 68k). Changed the resistor feeding the diode for the supply tap.
Fired it up and now with the stock 33K bias resistor on the pot i was getting 25ma per tube. Better? Well I couldn't crank it, so Im not sure yet. One thing that I did notice is that the noise floor in the power section (plate and screen filters) was way more noticeable. Is that why they had it biased so cold? It being UL, I guess the design goal was to stay clean and loud and that's probably why they boast 135W RMS. The thing won't want to clip with that bias. Which is fine. I just want it a little livelier. I don't want to modify the circuit (Preamp, NFB, etc) I just want to understand why they set it so cold and what my options are.
I've done adjustable fixed bias with balance before, but my buddy doesn't want extra holes in her.
I tried a few different quartets of tubes and they all pulled within 6-7ma difference per set.
I guess my questions are:
-Should I convert back to stock bias balance with stock values and change the bias feed resistors (off tap and on balance pot) to achieve a better bias level.
-As I bias hotter in either configuration (balance/adjustable fixed) will the perceivable noise floor always raise to an unacceptable level (IMO) Ripple is pretty low as measured.
-Anybody got any crafty ideas on how to keep here hum low and the tubes a little hotter and more responsive??
Thanks