Ritchie200,
Glad you had a positive flintlock experience. Nothing beats quality here. The only muzzleloader rifle I have fired is my own which I won at an archery competition in the '80's or 90's. It's a lower Traditions model, barely adequate with a substandard lock mechanism. I used to call it the Civil Servant, 'cause it won't work and you can't fire it. I eventually learned to pamper it into firing reliably enough. It is accurate. It has a synthetic stock. It's a short Hawkins style barrel, well-balanced. I find quality flintlocks to be barrel heavy.
The lock mechanism should cause an impressive shower of sparks to rain down upon the powder in the pan. This derives from flint against the iron frisson. But my frisson is a cheap alloy. Not only that but the hammer has a short range of travel, so it also lacks proper force to make sparks. How short is it? It's so short that unless the flint is ridiculously tiny, it lifts the frisson at half-cock, so the powder leaks out of the pan. Again, I've learned to compensate for these shortcomings.
A set & hair trigger combo, which I don't have, is a real plus with flintlocks, because it reduces lock time. Shorter lock time helps reduce the tendency to flinch while waiting for what may seem like hours for the trigger to travel, the hammer to strike, the sparks to shower down, the powder in the pan to flare up in your face, and the main charge to eventually explode. Then if there's no wind, you wait quietly for the smoke to clear, to see if everything in the world is still where it used to be. And if the deer dropped in its tracks, or if it used the cover of the smoke cloud to make you guess where it may have run off to.