I have an amp, AX84 Lead 2 preamp with single-ended output. A vintage 6CA7 sounds amazing, 6V6s have too much treble, 6L6s have too much bass.
It depends on the circuit. Mine is a "weak" driver for the output tube because signal goes through tone controls and master volume first. So it's sensitive to differences in the output. I've found a tube that's perfect for this amp, but other amps might not show much difference between tubes at all.
Next I am wondering about wattage. I know that watts are power used To simplify it the heat given off by the tube ad it uses energy. When calculating amp wattage I used the formula where I take kathode voltage divided by kathode resistors tested value to yield current the subtract kathode voltage from plate voltage and multiply by current to get watts at idle . Well when I was running other tubes in that slot and calculated it's virtually the same wattage but the 5881 was much louder than 6f6,6k6,6v6 so does that mean the 5881 is just a more efficient tube.
It is more powerful.
Tube power is less-than-ideal because a tube can't draw increasing current as voltage drops towards 0. If the tube doesn't operate down to 0% of available voltage, this means
the load/output won't experience 100% of the available voltage.
Valvewizard has a page which goes into more detail:
http://www.valvewizard.co.uk/se.htmlAnd on their push-pull page
http://www.valvewizard.co.uk/pp.html there is an estimate for power: P = 2 * (HT-50)^2 / Rload
That estimate assumes about 50v is unused, but that page examined EL84 data and found they can do "better" at 35v.
So is it more efficient? Yes, in terms of output power. But the EL84
filament draws more than the similar 6V6, and the 5881
filament draws nearly twice as much as a 6V6. This allows higher maximum current and better performance. So it may work better, but that performance isn't "free"