Sorry for the long post, but I think this is important...
IF you wanted to have NFB but also wanted to have a mix control of the FX.....
I didn't realize that I could have (or would want) this amp without NFB. Dumble is one of those builders where I would be wise to leave it as he made it. But, I wasn't necessarily looking for the same Dumble sound that I hear from a lot of other demos, so I wasn't afraid to try it "my way".
I am a kinda sloppy, not very precise, harder edge'd, classic/hard rock player. I play right on the edge of feedback and love having to control the strings from vibrating, and notes that turn into harmonic feedback. Eliminating NFB made this more pronounced.
If you go back to the
FX thread, you'll see that the reason I got rid of it came about accidently. I never thought I was going to work the 2 signals into the phase inverter like I did, but when I did the result was more than I expected.
So, just to be as clear as possible because I think this is something that might be worth trying (for you or others), here's the Cliff's notes:
- The FX mix control (in my original schematic, similar to the idea you posted) appeared to be cancelling out a lot of signal when set to 50/50 mix (maybe why some people don't love certain FX loops

)
- I looked at the design and realized that I was mixing 2 signals that were 180 deg. out of phase with each other, therefore causing the cancellation effect.
- My solution (based on Merlin's writings) was to split the signal into each half of the PI and see what happens.
- To do that I had to eliminate the global NFB loop which added noise and volume and a general sense that I was making a big mistake.
- But, I bought in because I wanted to see what would happen, so I tweaked the amp to have less treble bite and ran with it.
- My thought process is this:
If us hard rock guys think everything sounds better when cranked and NFB gets reduced or eliminated at full output, then why not eliminate the NFB loop so the amp will have that same "cranked feel" at lower volumes....maybe?
- Once I committed to this extreme design change I haven't looked back
- It is amazing to me that the amp sounds just fine if I only have the dry signal turned up or if I only have the FX signal turned up-
The PI still somewhat balances itself and I wind up with a decent output tone.
- BUT, when I turn them both up at the same time, HOLY COW, it's a Big Bad flame thrower type tone that I was looking for.
I believe that by using a 12AY7 in the PI I now have the ability to send 2 big OD signals into the PI and not have the extra clipping that a 12AX7 would cause. I believe that this is partially why I am loving this amp so much right now.
To me, it is gritty and heavily over-driven but not like a chain-saw tone that I would normally associate with other very high gain amps.
I hope this makes sense and helps someone, or at least helps you understand me.