For the bypassed frequencies, output impedance at the plate is 38.5k, so 61k/(38.5k + 61k) = 61% of the gain at the plate = better
Super helpful Tubeswell, as usual. I am going to plan on doing something more in the 10-25uf bypass on V1 for a more fully bypassed first stage. Do you have a ballpark percentages of what the loss is on say a tweed or 18 watt single tone control, or on the AB763 TMB stack? Just so I could compare that?
You will get some improvement if you have an extra triode with which to parallel v1, depending on whether your parallel stage is set up for same gain-more current, or more gain-slightly less current.
Since I have two tubes, and a low need for dirt, I am planning to use V2 for a LTPI, and V1a and V1b in parallel for a first stage. Practically speaking, I'm not sure how to accomplish the more gain vs more current thing, or what the final outcome would be tonewise. Are you talking like how hot the cathode is biased (say 820R vs 2.7K) and plate load resistor values? Where could I learn more about that, and maybe see some example values?
The tone control is a band-stop, bridged T-filter with an adjustable mid-scoop-kinda-tilt control. You build what you like
I'm not sure what I like, I'm just trying to do something "simple-ish" that's not something I already have, and that might fit this chassis. I have a single ended Super Lead sorta thing (CF>TMB), an EF86 into EL84 Dr Z(B+T), another EL84 dr z(TMB), a 65 Dual Showman, and a Princeton Reverb.
It really is a toss up between this Dr Z tone stack and the 18W. I don't think I want to go tweed with this chassis, but maybe an 18W. My plan was to do something cleaner, but still unique. If clean can even be a unique thing
