People think that is safer.It's not.
Inquiring minds and all, that leads to a question. Is it just as safe, less safe OR "You are never really safe".........
When you connect the power cord hot wire directly to the fuse (and nothing else), and the fuse blows or you remove it, then the only place inside the amp that has any voltage present is the power cord hot wire at the fuse holder. I think this is a good idea. Don't you?
When the power cord neutral is connected to the fuse (BTW, this was done as a matter of convenience to the manufacturer), and the fuse blows or you remove it, the 120VAC is still present through the switch, PT winding, and right up to the fuse holder. This leaves several exposed electrical terminals with 120VAC on them. I think this is a bad idea. Don't you?
Either way, I will not trust the wiring of any device that I didn't build. I will always verify presence of voltage with a meter before I stick a finger on any primary circuit terminal. How about you?
Modern manufacturers seem to have adopted the "hot wire to fuse then switch" idea and it's beginning to emerge as an unspoken standard. This probably stems from a NEC safety rule and standard that says the neutral conductor SHALL not be broken, ie, no switches, fuses, or other interrupter devices. The neutral SHALL be continuous all the way back to the breaker panel.
NEC does not cover your amp.Bottom line, if you don't know how the power cord is wired (don't blindly trust the schematic!) it's probably a good idea to unplug the cord and verify for yourself. Then determine the risk level you are comfortable with.
