I've been toying with designs for an Ampeg V4 inspired project. I posted about it a long while ago and only recently dove back in.
Let's assume that I've got the preamp & power amp sections mostly settled.
- The preamp section uses 7 triodes (mix and match of 12AX7s and 12AU7s, with 1 unused triode. Sad, I know).
- The power amp section (including Phase Inverter) is 1x12AX7 + 2x6V6S.
I grabbed a copy of Designing Power Supplies for Tube Amplifiers and am looking to understand what Ampeg was doing here. I built the V4 power supply in KiCAD and attached the PDF, along with the various output nodes and their target voltages as described in the original schematic. One thing to note is that in the PDF I have removed the standby switching altogether, but left the 180k pilot light resistor in because I forgot it. Also, for the project I'm working on I tentatively chose the Hammond 270FX, so please don't take that as what I feel the original Ampeg V4 power transformer might be.
In the book and elsewhere, typical power supplies are described as having a reservoir capacitor, followed by a network of smoothing & filtering stages. The V4 supply seems to do it a little different:
Instead of starting with a single reservoir capacitor right after the rectifier, it throws the voltage into a network of paralleled resistors and caps (R1, R2, C1-C4) before moving towards the filtering / smoothing stages.
- Does that parallel network act as a single reservoir? I know the voltages in this amp can be just absurd, so I'm wondering if this was their way of building up the power needed, as maybe a single capacitor wasn't reasonable?
- If, just hypothetically, one wanted to use a variation of this power supply but remove the entire reverb circuit from the amp, what is best done with R5 and C7? I can't imagine removing them entirely is the right approach, as it would impact nodes D and E. Thoughts?
- If anyone has deeper insight around the choices Ampeg made I would love to hear them.