Welcome To the Hoffman Amplifiers Forum

October 01, 2025, 01:51:30 pm
guest image
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
-User Name
-Password



Hoffman Amps Forum image Author Topic: Pro- amp planning  (Read 3037 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Pro- amp planning
« on: September 13, 2025, 06:22:12 am »
Hi all,

Am at the head scratching stage of a new amp build. Building from a laney lc50 mk2. Want to build the normal channel from the 6g5 as I'm slightly obsessed with the segeborn demo of the cranked brownface pro. Initially will reuse the el34 that the laney came with.

I have 2 spare pre amp tubes and am planning options. Obvious is reverb and or trem, not really interested in building with the harmonic trem and don't have enough pre amp tubes anyway. But then I was listening to some tweed demos and was thinking I could build a 5c5 1952 pro channel in as well with 12ay7 and 12ax7 PI.

I'm not finding any examples of 2 channel amps with separate pi. Obvious option would be a dpdt switch between the two channels into the PA but maybe there's a way to avoid the switch?

A single 5c5 channel would still leave a half 12ay7 unused...

Offline Jonas

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 132
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2025, 10:58:54 am »
Mike, you could experiment with a pentode channel. The pentode could be cascaded into the second half of the 6G5 channel. NO need for switch but you could use AB box to switch between channels or volume pedal to blend in the pentode

Jonas

Offline tubeswell

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2025, 12:23:16 pm »
head scratching… normal channel from the 6g5… could build a 5c5 1952 pro channel in as well with 12ay7 and 12ax7 PI… Obvious option would be a dpdt switch between the two channels into the PA but maybe there's a way to avoid the switch?


So, do you want 2 phase inverters? Or?
« Last Edit: September 13, 2025, 12:25:33 pm by tubeswell »
A bus stops at a bus station. A train stops at a train station. On my desk, I have a work station.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2025, 12:41:37 pm »
Yes, 2 phase inverters going into the 6g5/ EL34 PA

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2025, 01:15:59 pm »
Sorry if I was unclear, as I said I'm still at the thinking stage. I am asking how two phase inverters can go into a single push pull power stage. In this hypothetical case, the normal channel of a 6g5 with ltp and the 5c5 grid leak pre and paraphrase pi ( I think that's right!) I have two input jacks available.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2025, 10:37:07 am »
To add to my unanswered questions would an ev15L be to much speaker for these circuits? Ideally I'd get a weber p15n style speaker but I'm in europe and affordable options are limited.

Offline tubeswell

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2025, 04:39:07 pm »
Sorry if I was unclear, as I said I'm still at the thinking stage. I am asking how two phase inverters can go into a single push pull power stage. In this hypothetical case, the normal channel of a 6g5 with ltp and the 5c5 grid leak pre and paraphrase pi ( I think that's right!) I have two input jacks available.
Well, you could use up a lot of real estate including 2 noval tube sockets and two completely separate lots of parts on the main board and have a 3PDT switch to flick the 2 inputs and the (2 sets of) 2 outputs. Or see if some guy called Rob with a website has dreamed up some complicated switching concept.


But if it was my own project, I’d stick to building one of each type of Pro amp (and the result would just be a whole bunch of amps). Paraphase inverters have their own mojo. But so to amps with LTP inverters.
But complicated switch arrangements also add the potential for a whole load of extra stuff (uninvited noises etc) to troubleshoot, which might or might not appeal to you.
A bus stops at a bus station. A train stops at a train station. On my desk, I have a work station.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2025, 02:58:05 am »
Ok great thanks. I can't find any switching info on rob's site. Iwasn't going to use octal pre, just 12ay and ax7. Anyway...

I don't want to be so ambitious I never get it working... if I build the 6g5 normal channel with two 12ax7 what would be a good use of the other two pre tubes which would be less likely to cause me a headache? I could add 2 tube reverb with a bypass switch but I don't use much reverb and I like gnarly 50s tones. Maybe a second channel with trem going into the ltp as 'normal'?

Any ideas/ suggestions appreciated.

Also any thoughts on the ev speaker I mentioned appreciated too.

Offline tubenit

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 10289
  • Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all!
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2025, 05:21:43 am »
Quote
Any ideas/ suggestions appreciated.


Suggestion #1: Before you begin any work at all ................... post a schematic of what you are attempting to do.


Suggestion #2: Accept that you are making enough changes from the original Fender amp you like that it won't sound the  same but may still sound great.


With respect, Tubenit



Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2025, 06:31:29 am »
Work in progress sorry its handwritten. 6g5 normal channel with ppimv, cathode/ fixed bias and variable b plus on the PA section. I know this won't function in fixed bias mode. Will put the nfb on a switch. I want to be able to play the 6g5 normal channel in as unaltered form as possible.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2025, 06:34:49 am »
Hopefully more schematic here.

I have plenty of room in the chassis by the way

Offline tubenit

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 10289
  • Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all!
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2025, 07:01:13 am »
That looks reasonable to me.  The V1-b cathode resistor can be 1.5k instead of 820ohm if it's not be shared by another cathode.


I've not seen cathode/fixed bias done on an EL-34 amp before. I don't know why that wouldn't work though?  I have found more often than not when I've added a switch on an amp that I find a favored position and don't actually switch it much. An example is that when I've installed pentode/triode switching .......... after some time I end up removing the switch.
You may (or may not) find that to be the case on this amp design regarding the fixed/cathode bias approach?   


Just a personal preference thing for me, but over the years I've found I prefer cathode biased on my amps.  When I want to make it sound more "fixed biased" in tone, I'll up the value on the cathode cap.  For example, instead of maybe 25uf or 50uf, I'll use 100uf for the cathode cap on the power tubes. The larger cap value makes it sound more fixed biased to my ears. Just a thought to consider.  I'm not suggesting you "should" do this.


I think the cathode biased approach you're using will work?  Note how Matchless does this with EL-34's.
CLUBMAN.DSN - CLUBMAN - Page1


Thanks for sharing the schematic.     With respect, Tubenit

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2025, 07:13:33 am »
Great thanks. Took the el34 stuff and the bias switch from 18watt.com - the 36w and the vajra variant.

So now I just have two pre amp tubes to utilise. I could add the tremolo tmb channel from 18watt but I'd like something gnarly and 50s/tweedier, but sharing the ltp pi with the 6g5 channel.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2025, 02:01:27 pm »
Just to be annoying, to go back to the 5c5 channel option with 2 PI's..
couldn't I treat the paraphase pi as a gain stage and either insert one side of the paraphase PI into the lpt. Or insert each OPP output from the paraphase into both sides of the ltp?

If that doesn't make sense I'll try to sketch it out.

My thinking is that the ltp has little or no gain so the 5c5 channel goes through 2pi's without much affecting the tone?

Offline tubeswell

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2025, 03:10:26 pm »
Bias switch
A bus stops at a bus station. A train stops at a train station. On my desk, I have a work station.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2025, 03:54:14 pm »
Sorry tubeswell, I'm looking hard at your switch and I can't see how it differs from the one I drew onto my schematic.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #16 on: September 18, 2025, 04:59:05 pm »
Maybe you're pointing out I can't use the paraphase in any way with the bias switching, I see that now.

Offline tubeswell

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #17 on: September 19, 2025, 02:38:14 am »
Maybe you're pointing out I can't use the paraphase in any way with the bias switching, I see that now.


Anything is possible with more complicated switching, but that also adds potential for unwanted complications.
A bus stops at a bus station. A train stops at a train station. On my desk, I have a work station.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #18 on: September 19, 2025, 03:42:27 am »
So an obvious second channel would be a Tweed bassman but would that be much different in sound to the 6g5 channel?

Any suggestions for a more primitive channel as a second channel into the ltp appreciated.

Thanks all for your patience.

Offline passaloutre

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #19 on: September 19, 2025, 09:52:30 am »
I've been really enjoying the Matchless Spitfire I built recently. Very primitive preamp, just a paralleled 12AX7 with a volume control and simple tone control.

https://el34world.com/charts/Schematics/files/Matchless/Matchless_spitfire.pdf
« Last Edit: September 19, 2025, 10:00:18 am by passaloutre »

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #20 on: September 19, 2025, 10:13:46 am »
That would be straightforward and probably a good contrast but I should have mentioned the two amps I have built so far have been marshall 18watt derived...

Offline passaloutre

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2025, 12:21:18 pm »
Then my next choose would be the Supro Thunderbolt preamp with the Big Muff-style tone control and the optional cascaded gain stages.


Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2025, 04:06:06 pm »
Ooo, that might be great. Did you build it? You running it through a 15"? Really appreciate the idea thankyou

Offline tubeswell

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #23 on: September 20, 2025, 12:45:57 am »
What passaloutre said - I’ve always like the way my T-bolt builds turned out too.
A bus stops at a bus station. A train stops at a train station. On my desk, I have a work station.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #24 on: September 20, 2025, 03:13:31 am »
Ok I like it but that only uses the one pre tube and I'm worried I'll try to use the fourth doing something else which will cause me difficulty...I know I could just leave the hole...

Offline Esquirefreak

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 393
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #25 on: September 20, 2025, 08:56:14 am »
Are we talking about the 6G5 or the 6G5-A?

I've built a couple of amps using the 6G5 "center volume" tone stack. One is CF driven and the other one is anode driven. Very cool tone stack, but pretty different. I've altered the stock tone stack component values in both of my builds. The allows a mellow mid scoop and a decent mid bump. In the amp with the CF driven tone stack I even added a cap and switch to make a switchable mid boost. Let me know if you want a schematic.

/Max
« Last Edit: September 21, 2025, 04:10:14 am by Esquirefreak »

Offline passaloutre

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #26 on: September 20, 2025, 10:25:25 am »
Ooo, that might be great. Did you build it? You running it through a 15"? Really appreciate the idea thankyou

I didn’t build it, I bought a vintage one that already had the mod done. And yes it sounds fabulous through the original Jensen 15”.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #27 on: September 20, 2025, 11:05:06 am »
Are we talking about the 6G5 or the 6G5-A?

I've built a couple of amps using the 6G5 "center volume" tone stack. One is CF driven and the other one is anode driven. Very cool tone stack, but pretty different. I've altered the stock tone stack component values in both of my builds. The allows a mellow mid scoop and a decent mid bump. In the amp with the CF tone stack driven I even added a cap and switch to make a switchable mid boost. Let me know if you want a schematic.

/Max

I'm embarrassed to say I thought the normal channels were the same... I'd like to start with it stock but now I don't know which one! This is the dream tone

i=-Ou2dP0dpmlcb9K_

I'll have to watch again to see if I can spot 5 or 6 preamp tubes, unless anyone knows which one it is.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #28 on: September 20, 2025, 03:15:02 pm »
Ok, had a very careful look. Pretty sure 6 pre amp tubes so the -A variant I think. Also a ceramic oxford not the p15n he said in the comments so that might save me some money.

Looking at ev15l or the 15" legend speaker at the moment but seems like neither is the right option. Any suggestions?

Offline passaloutre

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #29 on: September 20, 2025, 08:52:48 pm »
I like the WGS ceramic 15

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #30 on: September 21, 2025, 05:56:08 am »
I'm guessing I should put the cathode bias cap on a switch for the thunderbolt tone?

Max,  any documentation for 6g5a appreciated.

I assume I'm not trying to cram in the PI from the t bolt, please try to dissuade me from 1 tube reverb with my last pre tube!

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #31 on: September 21, 2025, 06:30:53 am »
https://ebay.us/m/sMCfxk

Guessing these heppner alnico wouldn't be high enough wattage handling?

Offline Esquirefreak

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 393
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2025, 01:13:43 am »
I don't have any documentation for the -A revision, unfortunately.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #33 on: September 22, 2025, 04:05:37 am »
https://ebay.us/m/sMCfxk

Guessing these heppner alnico wouldn't be high enough wattage handling?

Doing a bit of research these seem to be cts and probably ceramic but I might give them a try.

Offline tubeswell

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #34 on: September 22, 2025, 04:33:03 am »
https://ebay.us/m/sMCfxk

Guessing these heppner alnico wouldn't be high enough wattage handling?

Doing a bit of research these seem to be cts and probably ceramic but I might give them a try.


The round bells are just the magnet covers. I bet they're Alnico with a 'ni' (as in 'nickel'. not 'knee' as in 'kneecap' because we don't say 'kneeckel')
A bus stops at a bus station. A train stops at a train station. On my desk, I have a work station.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #35 on: September 24, 2025, 05:08:30 pm »
Ok I've tried to write out the cascaded t bolt channel only, I'm not sure it's correct and I'd like to know where to put a switch for the cascade?

I'm also trying to learn and understand more as I go. What is the .001uf cap to ground doing from the v1 plate?

I assume I just use the first half of the paraphase pi as a gain stage then straight in to the LTP directly before the .001 cap into the PI grid.

Lastly I'm just assuming/ hoping the 6g5a power supply section will provide roughly suitable voltages to the t bolt channel.

This is still leaving me with half a 12ax7. I think I need to come to terms with not using it...

Offline shooter

  • Level 5
  • *******
  • Posts: 11059
  • Karma Loves haters
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #36 on: September 24, 2025, 06:15:30 pm »
Quote
I think I need to come to terms with not using it...


could make it a CF to feed CH2


the .001uF shunts bad-mojo AC to ground. but I could be wrong, it's harvest season  :icon_biggrin:


once you have it all dialed in, make a note to come back n tweak that cap, sometimes they stunt some good mojo also.
Went Class C for efficiency

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #37 on: September 25, 2025, 03:58:17 am »
I guessed it was shunting high frequency to ground to deter oscillation. Don't understand what you mean about the CF, each channel will have its own input socket.

Offline shooter

  • Level 5
  • *******
  • Posts: 11059
  • Karma Loves haters
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #38 on: September 25, 2025, 06:36:50 am »
you have "V2a" feeding into, "driving", CH2 on the schematic.   use "V2b" as a Cathode follower (CF) to "drive" that stage
Went Class C for efficiency

Offline passaloutre

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #39 on: September 25, 2025, 10:10:55 am »
Ok I've tried to write out the cascaded t bolt channel only, I'm not sure it's correct and I'd like to know where to put a switch for the cascade?

I'm also trying to learn and understand more as I go. What is the .001uf cap to ground doing from the v1 plate?

I assume I just use the first half of the paraphase pi as a gain stage then straight in to the LTP directly before the .001 cap into the PI grid.

Lastly I'm just assuming/ hoping the 6g5a power supply section will provide roughly suitable voltages to the t bolt channel.

This is still leaving me with half a 12ax7. I think I need to come to terms with not using it...

Your schematic looks very good. I don't think you will want the first stage of the paraphase, as the LTP already has about the same amount of gain built-in.

 I do think you'll want to make the input "cascade" stage switchable--most people wire the T-Bolt so that one input jack is a single triode, and the other jack goes through both jacks. It's nice to have both options, as they're very different sounds.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #40 on: September 25, 2025, 01:05:46 pm »
Yeah I only have one jack input available for the channel for this channel as the chassis currently is. I thought ltp was unity gain and paraphase added gain?

Offline passaloutre

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #41 on: September 25, 2025, 01:16:56 pm »
Paraphase and cathodyne are unity gain, which is why they almost always use the other triode for a gain stage. LTP performs gain and inversion with a single circuit, but it uses both triodes.

I find it easier to think of all three common phase inverter circuits as using two triodes to provide gain *and* inversion.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2025, 01:19:29 pm by passaloutre »

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #42 on: September 25, 2025, 03:50:29 pm »
So directly from the t bolt tone to the input cap of the lpt? Now I've got a whole preamp tube spare again!

Offline tubeswell

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #43 on: September 25, 2025, 05:02:40 pm »
Cathodyne is unity gain. Paraphase has the gain of a 'normal' triode for one side, and the output taken from this is attenuated before its put into the grid of the triode on the other side - so that the output of the following triode is about the same as that of the first triode.

Edit - see attachment for another idea about what to do with the extra triode configured as a switchable single/parallel input stage. So you get different gain settings depending on which input you use, (but it's not as gainy as cascading two triodes).  Or it has the added flexibility of simultaneous stereo inputs directly from your pedal board (so that you can control effect/gain options differently on your pedal board).

This tone stack (vastly different from a T-bolt) is configured to work with the V1 output to achieve a flat response when both treble and bass pots are at mid-rotation (without the 'slope' switch on), or a slight mid scoop with both pots at full rotation, or a slight mid-hump with both pots fully at cut rotation. I also found it works really good for harp if you clip out the 100pF brite cap on the volume pot

Also note that gain increases noticeably if the cathode resistor for the output tubes is fully bypassed.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2025, 07:17:34 pm by tubeswell »
A bus stops at a bus station. A train stops at a train station. On my desk, I have a work station.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #44 on: September 25, 2025, 06:06:59 pm »
Really appreciate all this and giving me loads to think about/ figure out. Just to be clear the laney I am repurposing has 4x12ax7. My 6g5a channel uses one, one for the ltp. The tbolt pre is only using one as well,  if not including any of the paraphase inverter or the cathode follower as previously suggested. That leaves the fourth...

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #45 on: September 26, 2025, 04:57:57 pm »
The Paraphase pi on the thunderbolt doesn't connect to the cathode bias of the power tubes. Couldn't I keep the whole tbolt circuit including the paraphase pi then just have a dpdt to switch either channel into the grid stoppers of the el34s? this doesn't seem too complex to me or am I being native/ over optimistic?

Offline tubeswell

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #46 on: September 26, 2025, 09:39:25 pm »
The Paraphase pi on the thunderbolt doesn't connect to the cathode bias of the power tubes.


That just looks like that because the way it's drawn o n that schematic. In reality, everything with a ground symbol is connected to the signal ground
A bus stops at a bus station. A train stops at a train station. On my desk, I have a work station.

Offline Mike-p

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Pro- amp planning
« Reply #47 on: September 29, 2025, 02:36:27 pm »
Yes of course, I didn't follow the schematic properly. I'm trying to temper my ambition in order to succeed. Trying to build a circuit into a donor amp is already ambitious for me. Here's my plan now.

 Draw up my schematic with all the trimmings.

2 channels into ltp,

bias switch and voltage regulation for the power tubes but only to be used in cathode bias mode or if changing and rebiasing for fixed bias with different tubes ie 6k6 which require lower voltage.

Cathode bias bypass cap switchable

Switchable nfb

Internal jumper switch to use both channels

Mosfet driven trem on tbolt preamp tube

1 tube reverb without transformer if possible.

THEN

Draw up a layout to fit my donor chassis WITHOUT the trem or reverb or other inadvisably tricky mods, BUT ensuring I can install them subsequently without extra difficulties due to the way i laid out the stripped back version.

Get it working without the trickier extra features first then add them if I still want them.

If anyone can point me to;

A schematic for a switch to jumper the two channels

Mosfet preamp bias trem schematic

A suitable one tube reverb, probably just for the t bolt channel, Doesn't need to provide tons of reverb but does need to sound good not just add splashy mush to the sound! I have two different spring tanks but both are for SS circuits so I assume I can't use either?

 


Choose a link from the
Hoffman Amplifiers parts catalog
Mobile Device
Catalog Link
Yard Sale
Discontinued
Misc. Hardware
What's New Board Building
 Parts
Amp trim
Handles
Lamps
Diodes
Hoffman Turret
 Boards
Channel
Switching
Resistors Fender Eyelet
 Boards
Screws/Nuts
Washers
Jacks/Plugs
Connectors
Misc Eyelet
Boards
Tools
Capacitors Custom Boards
Tubes
Valves
Pots
Knobs
Fuses/Cords Chassis
Tube
Sockets
Switches Wire
Cable


Handy Links
Tube Amp Library
Tube Amp
Schematics library
Design a custom Eyelet or
Turret Board
DIY Layout Creator
File analyzer program
DIY Layout Creator
File library
Transformer Wiring
Diagrams
Hoffmanamps
Facebook page
Hoffman Amplifiers
Discount Program


password