Welcome To the Hoffman Amplifiers Forum

January 23, 2026, 07:51:44 pm
guest image
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
-User Name
-Password



Hoffman Amps Forum image Author Topic: 65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature  (Read 951 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mxrshiver

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature
« on: December 10, 2025, 05:28:48 pm »
this one had a lot of issues when it came in, including two separate places where the filament supply was shorting directly to ground (sloppy soldering at V4 tube socket, and a poorly mounted humdinger), and a cheap molded speaker plug that was internally intermittent. ugh! tubes were almost all very worn out, and the power tube sockets were a total mess of flux and carbon, but luckily, nothing got to the point of actually arcing, or shorting out a tube or transformer - bless those ceramic sockets! and after a lot of solder re-work and cleaning, as well as a full re-tube and re-cap, it's performing perfectly and sounds lovely - 90W max clean output, less than 3mV noise on output with controls at minimum, all DC voltages in proportion to each other and within the +/- 20% spec. i should also state off the bat that it was also requested that the circuit be kept as original as possible, while doing what's needed to make it reliable.

however, the voltages are all running around 10-12% high at the original bias setting, up to more like 20% for the reverb driver cathode voltage. not a huge deal for most of the amp, but this puts the screens of the power tubes and the reverb driver supply at like 480V, not ideal, especially with 4x screens only separated from the plate by the choke. i made the bias voltage a couple volts lower than spec to bring down the B+ (original bias setting was only about 11.5W per plate and we installed those fabulous Tung-Sol RI 7581A's, so they can definitely take it), but that still is only bringing it to about 465V.

my biggest concern is the power transformer temperature, though. to my eye, this one looks a bit undersized for 4x 6L6 and 6x 12A_7, and it certainly feels like it - in open air at idle for 30 minutes, it was far too hot to keep my fingers on for more than a couple seconds. i could dial the bias voltage back to spec, but that would push the B+ back to 480V and pushes the filaments closer to 6.9V, so i wouldn't really be improving things overall, just replacing one concern with another.

the owner will eventually be getting a variac, but i'm trying to assess whether i'd even recommend playing the amp until he does... and whether it's possible the power transformer may be extra hot due to damage sustained from the two filament shorts. i can't imagine the windings have shorted anywhere, or else i'd probably be getting lower voltages if anything, but it seems it was running with those filament shorts for a long time without blowing any fuses, somehow.

i plan on getting the chassis back into the cabinet, letting it idle for a few hours, and then taking temperature readings on the power transformer, to decide on what i recommend. plan is, if the power transformer measures around 150 degrees F or lower, i'd say it's fine to play before the variac, but probably keep it to reasonable volumes... if it's more like 150-160 degrees, i'd recommend lower volumes and also short sessions (perhaps 20-30 minutes) before shutting it off... and much above 160 degrees, i'd avoid playing it at all.

do you think i'm being over-cautious, or not cautious enough? i'd love to get any other takes on what temperature thresholds any of you might use for similar determinations, either in general or in this specific situation. if anyone has suggestions for additional testing for the power transformer to evaluate whether it's been compromised or not, that would be awesome. thanks in advance!

Offline astronomicum

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: 65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2025, 10:55:03 am »
I am not following your reasoning on the bias. Higher B+ would typically indicate lower B+ current resulting in lower transformer temperature while the opposite being true for a Lower B+. I would think that if you want a lower PT temperature, you would want to stick with the original bias settings. I am also not sure how a variac will solve a weak PT issue. Reducing the voltage would typically require increasing bias current to compensate resulting in the same PT secondary load (VA) and most likely the same PT temperature. You can always do your temperature tests at both bias settings to see what happens to the PT temperature.

Offline BrianS

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 173
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: 65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2025, 03:18:22 pm »
"90 Watts MAX"...is that peak or RMS?  Schematic states minimum 85 watts RMS.
Does your variac have a current meter?  Or do you have a Kill-a-watt device that can tell you how much total current the amp is drawing?  That might tell you something.
Handing an amp back to a customer with caveats seems like a bad idea. If they have to follow a set of arbitrary rules when using it, is the amp really repaired?
Also, why would the end user run a modern amp with a variac?

Offline mxrshiver

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: 65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2025, 02:59:46 pm »
thanks for the help!

my main interest is determining whether the power transformer is compromised or not, whether the amount of heat it's dissipating is normal, or an indication that it has sustained damage... and overall, how high of a PT temp would be sustainable. i'm wondering what most folks regard as a safe temperature range - at what temperature would you start considering replacement, what temperature would you definitely replace it at, etc.

i'm also wondering if there are any other more direct methods of isolating and testing the transformer to evaluate it thoroughly without putting the whole amp at risk. my best method is using ohm's law to calculate a large power resistor for each secondary winding that will simulate the actual load, and to load it with those and track voltage and temperature over time - for 480V B+ and roughly 120mA bias current, i'd use a 4K 100W+, and for the filaments at 6.3V/5.4A, i'd use a 1.2R 50W+, and expect them to both get very hot. just a bit of a pain to get the right values.

besides the high temperature and voltages, and the known history of a sustained filament short, i haven't observed or measured anything that directly indicates issues with the PT - the voltages are in proportion to each other and rock steady, and power supply noise is very low - but the temp and higher than expected voltages, and known history of a failure state, are enough to raise my concern.

measuring primary current is a great idea, thanks! input is supposed to be 260W, so i may just stick a 0.1R 5W in the primary temporarily to measure the voltage across it, which should be about 0.21V if it's correct. i may do the same for the filament winding, as i'm more concerned about it as that's where the shorts were - current should be 5.4A, so i should see a 0.54V drop across a 0.1R.

the 90W output is RMS, sorry i should have specified. the roughly 5% increase from the 85W on the schematic is about what i'd expect with these higher voltages.

i agree that the original bias voltage resulting in lower plate current, would probably result in lower transformer temperature overall, but i'm concerned with how high that would push the B+ (480V) and filament voltage (6.9VAC). i'm mainly concerned with filament voltage that high reducing tube lifespans, and the high B+ is mostly of concern for the power tube screens which have a 450V max (and are only 2V away from the plate voltage), and for the reverb driver tube and transformer, which are tapped off the main B+ and were already pushed far past the 330V max for the 12AT7 plate by design.

for whatever reason, the amp is behaving like an amp from the 60's that was designed for more like 115-117VAC or lower primary voltage... usually i find amps from the 90's and 00's to have the voltages run more like maybe 2-3% above schematic values at the most, but this nearly 10% is more similar to what i'd see from 60's or even 70's amps.

i agree that having the variac isn't ideal from my perspective, but the idea in reducing primary voltage, is that it would allow me to bring the bias back to the original cooler setting, reducing PT temperature without the supply voltages getting too high as a result - basically just bringing both voltage and current back to schematic values. safest bet would be to replace the power transformer, but i'd be loathe to recommend that most expensive option without clear indication that it is compromised.

i've presented the owner with multiple options to address this issue, including a buck transformer, a few more thermistors in the primary, zeners to drop the B+ and metal oxide power resistors to drop the filament voltage... as well as the variac, and power transformer replacement/upgrade. while i'm still evaluating whether or not the power transformer is compromised and should be replaced either way, he's expressed he likes the variac idea most, as it's the least invasive, and allows for him to run the amp cooler most of the time, but also bring it back to the original voltage whenever he wants. i have cautioned him that it's possible for the variac to put out even higher primary voltage than the wall depending on the setting, and when he gets it, i'll be taking measurements with it hooked up to the amp, to determine the absolute highest setting on the dial he should ever use.

my recommendation is the buck transformer, and i've explained it would be doing exactly the same thing as the variac, but he'd rather make as few direct mods to the circuit as possible.

Offline mxrshiver

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: 65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2025, 02:58:20 am »
update - transformer temperature readings after 2 hrs at idle are as follows.

max exterior spot temp = 170F right next to the choke
average exterior laminate temp = 160F
average exterior end bell temp = 155F
max interior spot temp = 145F, same region as max ext. spot temp
average interior end bell temp = 130F

maximum circuit board temp = 115F
average circuit board temp through power supply = 110F
average circuit board temp through preamp = 100F


...what do you think? i'm not very happy with the laminates averaging 160F. my only real benchmark is that most modern components i purchase have a temperature rating of at least 85C/185F, and since iy seems likely it could climb those extra 15-25F under drive, i'm thinking only short sessions at moderate volumes until he can get the variac and i can cool off the bias back to normal. internal temp doesn't seem too bad.


also, forgot to note - my #1 suggestion for him by far was just having some sort of standalone fan at the back sucking the hot air away. if it's a substantial enough fan, i don't think any of the other measures to lower the primary voltage are strictly necessary. he didn't go for it because of the noise, and extra thing to move around with the amp.

Offline BrianS

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 173
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: 65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2025, 09:33:26 am »
I think you are looking for a problem that does not exist.

-You are getting the correct output from the amp with no other "issues" save for a temperature reading that you don't like.  This feeling is not based on any data point or spec, and so is irrelevant.

-Manufacturer gives no "temp spec"...that's not a thing in the tube amplifier world as far as I know.  If you read a bit about transformer wire insulation ratings, I think you will be more comfortable with the readings you are getting.  The surface temps of the power tubes is much higher than your transformer temp.

-This is my opinion only, as there are really no "industry standards" in the repair world:  if you have to hand a paying customer back his amp with caveats as to how to operate it, it is not repaired. The amp is designed and built to perform to certain specs, which are measurable.  It will perform to those specs if properly repaired.




Offline acheld

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 1325
  • No well conceived plan survives the event.
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: 65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2025, 11:49:31 am »
I understand your concern about the PT temps which seem higher than expected; I wouldn't like that either, but it probably does not indicate a problem with the transformer per se.

I think your best bet is to dial back the power output to its rated 85W (into 4ohm) via your bias circuit. I personally like to bias my power tubes around 60% and even lower, and the amps seem to run cooler.   I can't tell the difference in tone between 60 and 70%, though some say they can.  In the end it's your customers call.

Fans are great. Some of my new builds get them ---  modern computer fans really do not add detectable noise if set up correctly, and the

And, LOL, your customer must be young and/or a body builder to lug that amp along with a variac or buck transformer to a gig.  :icon_biggrin:

Offline mxrshiver

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: 65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2025, 09:04:17 pm »
thanks very much for your takes!

i ended up using a method in Merlin's power supply book to calculate the internal temperature from the change in primary winding resistance from hot to cold, and it turned out to be 172F. (this book is also where i got the 170F sensible limit) advised the owner to get it replaced with the Hammond 290EBZ as soon as he can, he's out of funds currently as both speakers also had bad voice coil rub and he opted to replace them. i told him it's his choice whether or not to use the amp before then, it's otherwise in really great shape with a very low noise floor, and given all the information it'll probably be alright with short sessions at low volume for a few months while he saves up, but i can't guarantee it 100%. he's opted to save up for the replacement transformer rather than get a variac.

i do feel like this sucker was marginally spec'd to begin with, and this level of heat may just be due to that, and not any damage. using Merlin's method of estimating VA in his power supply book comes out to 211VA, and the 290EBZ has a 10% thicker laminate stack and a VA of 258VA, so i'm guessing they felt similarly.

however, if there was a partial short on the primary, just between a few turns, the symptoms would likely be slightly higher secondary voltages and temperature, correct?

AC fan is a great idea! i did present it as an option, but i'm not sure if it'll do much in this case with the large open back.

Offline SEL49

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 421
  • I love Tube amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: 65 Twin Reverb RI - power transformer temperature
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2025, 11:10:01 pm »
I would just pull two of the output tubes and run much cooler. 2x6L6 is still very loud.

 


Choose a link from the
Hoffman Amplifiers parts catalog
Mobile Device
Catalog Link
Yard Sale
Discontinued
Misc. Hardware
What's New Board Building
 Parts
Amp trim
Handles
Lamps
Diodes
Hoffman Turret
 Boards
Channel
Switching
Resistors Fender Eyelet
 Boards
Screws/Nuts
Washers
Jacks/Plugs
Connectors
Misc Eyelet
Boards
Tools
Capacitors Custom Boards
Tubes
Valves
Pots
Knobs
Fuses/Cords Chassis
Tube
Sockets
Switches Wire
Cable


Handy Links
Tube Amp Library
Tube Amp
Schematics library
Design a custom Eyelet or
Turret Board
DIY Layout Creator
File analyzer program
DIY Layout Creator
File library
Transformer Wiring
Diagrams
Hoffmanamps
Facebook page
Hoffman Amplifiers
Discount Program