> One of the caps in the filter can was doin' it.
If it's broke, fix it.
> rewire for 6SC7
If it aint broke, don't fix it.
Is the input sensitivity OK? You say it has tone and power. By my figurings, you need a hot pickup or a strong arm to MONDO OVERDRIVE it, it isn't Hendrix or Young trademark.... but that's not the point, is it? Any normal arm and axe should be able to cruise at 5 Watts and peak at "20W", forcing the ~~14W amp into "flavor territory". I'm thinking of dozens of musical styles where this is just-right.
> Don't believe they are made now, are they? That's back to the NOS stuff that has been handled and tossed around for 60 years
"Not made now" is a good thing. A good day in Moscow 2009 is like a bad day in Owensboro 1962. The 60 year storage does no harm except you should power-up and bake a few days before judging the bias (not relevant) and hiss.
The real problem is "sexy" NOS tubes. The high-buck vendors buy a crate, test, sell the primo examples at inflated price, and re-sell the marginal bottles. By now all the golden-age 6DJ8 and 12AX7 have been picked-over multiple times. May as well buy new-Russian. However the 6N7 has NEVER been "sexy". But it was a fine workhorse in 1933 large-radio and also as utility hammer in radar etc. And IMHO it is a fine gain=20 paraphase.
> 6N7 is running in class A - Pdiss rating in class A is 1.1W max.
Schem says 4.5V on 1.5K cathode resistor, 3mA to two cathodes, equal split, 1.5mA each. (Check: 55K plate resistor has 280V-200V= 80V across it, 80V/55K= 1.45mA, 1.45mA==1.5mA for practical purpose.) The 1.5mA with 195.5V tube-drop is 0.29 Watts per plate. This is far-far below the apparently conservative 1.1W rating.