1. Only your ears can decide if the impedance mismatch is desirable.
I would tend towards C instead of D, as most people would play a Super Reverb for its distorted sound, and I'd question the ability of 2 of the stock speakers to handle the power. That said, I don't know the rating of the stock speakers. However, I used to own a '67 Super Reverb, and 1 of the 4 speakers was blown without reducing the number of speakers handling the power.
2. Almost certainly not.
If you set up a pentode or beam power tube with a specific load to produce maximum clean output power, any change from that load (up or down) will result in less clean output power. You might change the balance of distortion products, but you won't get more clean. If we were talking triodes, the answer would be a little different.
One caveat: By increasing the load impedance, you will have a larger voltage present at the speaker terminals. That voltage is sampled by the feedback loop, which is presently optimized for a 2 ohm output impedance. So you will slightly increase the feedback when you switch to a higher load. 30w output and a 2 ohm load implies ~7.75v RMS at the speaker terminals; 30w and 4 ohms implies ~11v RMS. The voltage, and therefore the feedback increases by ~42%. Really, this is not very significant, but I point it out in the interest of thoroughness.
3. Yes.
But see answer 1 above; be careful about the power handling ability of the speakers.
4. The two approaches yield the same basic power and clean output, with the exception of the altered feedback, as noted above. I don't have an answer for why Fender chose not to use series-parallel wiring, but they always paralleled additional speakers when they added them.