Welcome To the Hoffman Amplifiers Forum

September 07, 2025, 01:34:44 pm
guest image
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
-User Name
-Password



Hoffman Amps Forum image Author Topic: negative feedback question  (Read 4650 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline navdave

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 580
  • 559
Hoffman Amps Forum image
negative feedback question
« on: January 03, 2012, 04:01:17 pm »
If the 33R resistor is the shunt and the 3.3k setting the bias for the tube does the the 3.3k resistor also block some feedback from reaching the tube?
http://www.el34world.com/charts/Schematics/files/ampeg/Ampegv4poweramp.pdf

Offline PRR

  • Level 5
  • *******
  • Posts: 17082
  • Maine USA
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: negative feedback question
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2012, 06:05:48 pm »
Kinda.

Offline navdave

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 580
  • 559
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: negative feedback question
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2012, 06:44:38 pm »
Kinda.
Hmmm so not enough to make a big difference?
So the 33r and 3.3k are forming voltage divider for the feedback?
And at the same time setting the bias for the tube with a total resistance
of 3.303K ?

Offline sluckey

  • Level 5
  • *******
  • Posts: 5075
    • Sluckey Amps
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: negative feedback question
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2012, 07:03:13 pm »
The 4.7K and 33Ω form the voltage divider for the feedback. The 3.3K (plus the 33Ω if you want to bother) set the tube bias. 3.3K plus 33Ω is 3.333K, not 3.303K.
A schematic, layout, and hi-rez pics are very useful for troubleshooting your amp. Don't wait to be asked. JUST DO IT!

Offline navdave

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 580
  • 559
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: negative feedback question
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2012, 07:26:56 pm »
The 4.7K and 33Ω form the voltage divider for the feedback. The 3.3K (plus the 33Ω if you want to bother) set the tube bias. 3.3K plus 33Ω is 3.333K, not 3.303K.
Mucho thank you for the explanation Sluckey.

Offline tubeswell

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4202
  • He who dies with the most tubes... wins
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: negative feedback question
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2012, 02:29:18 am »
You may think of the 3k3 bias resistor as 'bouncing up and down on top of' the 33R.

The amount of NFB at the junction of the 33r and the 4k7 is 33/(33+4700) = 0.007 of the VAC swing at the OT secondary. This is just enough to take the edge of the cathode voltage swing in the stage that is driving the LTP.
A bus stops at a bus station. A train stops at a train station. On my desk, I have a work station.

Offline PRR

  • Level 5
  • *******
  • Posts: 17082
  • Maine USA
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: negative feedback question
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2012, 02:47:09 pm »
At max power we have 52V peak at 7027 grids, 40V peak at 8 ohm tap. Output stage has gain of 0.8. 12AU7 stage has gain near 14. 12DW7 with 3.3K under has gain like 30.

30*14*0.8= 336

The 4.7K and 33 define a gain of 143.

NFB is slim when loaded in nominal impedance; it mosty controls the loudspeaker bass resonance where impedance may be 5X-10X nominal. Here the forward gain could exceed 1,000, but the NFB loop restrains it to near 140.

The 3.3K under 12DW7 is _local_ NFB in the 12DW7 stage, making it more linear. We really do not care: the 12DW7 only has to make 52V/7= 7 volts peak, where its THD will be under 1%, far less than the 12AU7 driver or the 7027 outputs. 

If you bypass the 12DW7's 3.3K you double the gain in this stage, have more NFB overall. But clearly Ampeg was not aiming for "high NFB"; indeed other models omit NFB around the output stage.

Depending on your speaker, you may wish to increase the 4.7K to 10K, 20K, 50K, or open, to get a more "raw" sound. 22K would make NFB similar to many Fenders, but won't make it sound like a Fender. Uh, a 120W amplifier may be too raw. You could reduce the 4.7K to 2K or maybe 1K, be more clean, but also lower gain.

Offline HotBluePlates

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 13127
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: negative feedback question
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2012, 04:21:25 pm »
At max power we have 52V peak at 7027 grids, 40V peak at 8 ohm tap. Output stage has gain of 0.8. 12AU7 stage has gain near 14. 12DW7 with 3.3K under has gain like 30.

30*14*0.8= 336

The 4.7K and 33 define a gain of 143.

For all of our future reference, can you explain how you arrived at the 4.7k and 33 ohm resistors defining a gain of 143?

Offline PRR

  • Level 5
  • *******
  • Posts: 17082
  • Maine USA
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: negative feedback question
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2012, 03:20:28 pm »
> how you arrived at the 4.7k and 33 ohm resistors defining a gain of 143?

Ratio. 4700:33 is 142.4, right? (Don't trust me, my slipstick is sloppy in the dry winter air.)


Offline printer2

  • Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 235
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: negative feedback question
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2012, 08:35:26 pm »
> how you arrived at the 4.7k and 33 ohm resistors defining a gain of 143?

Ratio. 4700:33 is 142.4, right? (Don't trust me, my slipstick is sloppy in the dry winter air.)



Probably used it so much the numbers are wore off.

 


Choose a link from the
Hoffman Amplifiers parts catalog
Mobile Device
Catalog Link
Yard Sale
Discontinued
Misc. Hardware
What's New Board Building
 Parts
Amp trim
Handles
Lamps
Diodes
Hoffman Turret
 Boards
Channel
Switching
Resistors Fender Eyelet
 Boards
Screws/Nuts
Washers
Jacks/Plugs
Connectors
Misc Eyelet
Boards
Tools
Capacitors Custom Boards
Tubes
Valves
Pots
Knobs
Fuses/Cords Chassis
Tube
Sockets
Switches Wire
Cable


Handy Links
Tube Amp Library
Tube Amp
Schematics library
Design a custom Eyelet or
Turret Board
DIY Layout Creator
File analyzer program
DIY Layout Creator
File library
Transformer Wiring
Diagrams
Hoffmanamps
Facebook page
Hoffman Amplifiers
Discount Program


password