... his amps have a big honkin' MOSFET on the top of the chassis so I assume he's using power scaling in one form or another. His comments about the PI and output tubes would lead me to believe that he's simply scaling the PI and output tubes. I also think this because in my experience scaling the whole amp to very low volumes sounds really bad, while doing just the PI and power tubes still sounds pretty good. ...
What if you had a single control that scales down the power amp and phase inverter, while a second pot section also reduces the drive signal from the preamp to the phase inverter?
You may not see them often, but there are dual-pots available, even if you need a 2w rated pot for your power-scale/VVR. They could even be dissimilar sections (probably by special order).
When using power scaling (as I understand it), if you don't scale the whole amp, you
have to have a master volume control between the scaled and unscaled parts of the amp. The amp is designed to have proper signal level before scaling; once one part of the amp is scaled to be "smaller" the unscaled signal looks "larger". You have to use a master volume to reduce the unscaled signal to keep from getting a too-distorted sound, or to allow a clean sound at the lower volume level. Otherwise, you can get less power, but more distortion is the only sound available.
... Doing so also keeps the drive to output tubes relatively the same, and the PI get slammed harder contributing to the 'grid clamping' effect.
What I find most interesting is that he thinks grid clamping is a good thing to a certain extent, while most people are trying to abate it. ...
You might be equating "grid clamping" to "grid blocking." Or maybe they're the same; I really don't know if there are set definitions for some of these things.
What
I think he's saying is there is a point on the volume of typical amps when the preamp/phase inverter is overdriving the output tubes to some extent, and hanging out in that region is a good thing. Less drive means no distortion/less touch sensitivty, while much more drive could be a ragged-sounding distortion (or in extremes, grid blocking).
What he may be calling clamping is this:
If you don't drive a tube grid positive (relative to the cathode), it looks like an extremely high impedance; the phase inverter can deliver its signal as intended. Once the grid is more positive than the cathode (positive peak input signal exceeds the bias), the grid starts collecting some of the current intended for the plate. It is no longer an extremely large impedance. If the bias is -35v, and you apply a 40v peak signal and that causes 1mA of grid current to flow, the grid looks like a 40k resistance.
The phase inverter is no longer lightly loaded by the grid of the output tube, but see a load drawing current that it was not designed to deliver. The phase inverter can't cope, and it's gain drops (we can demonstrate this with simple gain equation for a typical preamp tube stage). So, due to the output tube being overdriven, the phase inverter also has its output capability sapped. One could look at this as the output tube clamping the maximum signal the phase inverter can deliver.
There are amplifiers designed to drive output tube grids positive, for greater output power from the available tubes. Those are the class AB
2 or class B
2 amps, where you normally see the "1" in class AB
1 omitted. You'll usually see an output tube (say, 6V6 or 6L6) as a driver for a transformer that performs the phase splitting, which is able to deliver the
power (voltage
and current) demanded by the grid of the real output tubes. Almost every production guitar amp runs class AB1, and only requires drive voltage, not drive power.