With the 5% 1 ohm, I get 1.3 and 1.4 ohms on the meter. Not what I was hoping for.
A 5% 1 ohm resistor show read between 0.95 and 1.04 ohms, not 1.3 or 1.4 ohms.
...
Is Heresrobert DMM still giving him problems? probably.
I have a Fluke 87III DMM. If I measure those 1Ω resistors, I'll get 1.3 or 1.4Ω, too.
At that point, I'd engage the offset capability of the meter, and touch the meter probes together. That would set the probably 0.3-0.4Ω resistance of the meter leads as the new "Zero".
So don't fret, and you don't need 1% resistors for the test. 99.995% chance your measurement of resistance will be that 0.3-0.4Ω high due to meter lead resistance.
... I'm getting a meter reading of 22 ohms. Can that be right? I then measured a speaker rated at 4 ohms and it metered at 12 ohms. ...
You confirmed your meter is in the right ballpark, which is what PRR wanted you to check. If you still get resistance readings higher than the stated impedance of the speaker in question, there may be damage to the voice coil, or more likely a thick layer of something that's a poor conductor where you're probing. It's also possible to have a cold solder joint where the tinsel wires are brought out to the speaker terminals. Be sure to use good, firm pressure with the points for the meter leads when making a resistance measurement. That will help you press through any surface oxidation which will skew the readings.
I am not questioning Hot Plate credentials ... I believe the quoted answer is very simplistic, because impedance is a function of frequency.
...
Typically the DC reading of a speaker component is about 70 to 75% of the speaker impedance rating. Therefore, if the speaker is labeled 8 ohms nominal, the DC reading would about 6.3 ohms.
Dr Gonzo, you and I will have to agree to disagree.
On the one hand, you say d.c. resistance is typically a fixed percentage of total impedance, then say that impedances changes with frequency. For both statements to be true, resistance would also have to increase with increasing frequency. Since this is known to not be a valid property of resistance, it follows that d.c. resistance cannot be a fixed percentage of speaker impedance.
But this is what I've been arguing in my simplistic posts! PRR pointed out an issue I overlooked, being "air impedance" the speaker works against. I won't confuse the issue further here, but say that total speaker impedance = resistance + reactance + air impedance. That's A=b+c+d. What's the ratio of the a, b, c?
Simply put, there's no fixed ratio that is always valid because it depends on the particulars of the speaker design. The only thing you can honestly know is resistance is less than total impedance.
As an example, I have a JBL D130 that is a 16Ω speaker; It has a d.c. resistance of 6.2-6.4Ω, or less than 40% of total impedance. From PRR's information, much of the remainder is made up of air impedance due to the curvilinear cone.