Welcome To the Hoffman Amplifiers Forum

September 07, 2025, 12:33:44 pm
guest image
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
-User Name
-Password



Hoffman Amps Forum image Author Topic: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?  (Read 8018 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline schoolie

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 85
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« on: October 07, 2012, 03:22:30 am »
 Hi, I tried a 3.3uF capacitor in my 5f6a, in place of the 220uF cap.  Now I'm getting a large increase in hum which is present with nothing plugged in and increases with volume.   I think it's 60hz. Does this indicate a lead dress problem that was masked by the large cap, or maybe a  noisy 12Ay7? I checked the cathode ground side and it seems OK.  Does the bypass cap mask heater noise on V1?

Thanks!

Offline tubenit

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 10274
  • Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all!
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2012, 05:59:03 am »
I have NEVER had lowering a cathode cap value increase hum.  I don't think that's the issue. 

Could be a bad cap?  Could be that changing the cathode cap out messed up the cathode resistor?  Could be a soldering problem (lead dress)?  Could be a totally unrelated issue that ironically had at the same time. 

With respect, Tubenit

stratele52

  • Guest
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2012, 06:51:05 am »
+1 tubenit

This cap have nothing to do with hum .

Offline schoolie

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 85
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2012, 11:01:10 am »
Thank you, Tunenit and Stratele52.   Good to know that the cap value is not likely the culprit.

Offline PRR

  • Level 5
  • *******
  • Posts: 17082
  • Maine USA
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2012, 06:02:32 pm »
Classic tube books emphasize a large cathode cap to divert hum out of the cathode.

I suspect it has to do with tube quality (leaky heater-cathode) and also lead dress. So different workers may get different results.

I have not personally experimented.

Offline schoolie

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 85
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2012, 07:33:07 pm »
Thank you, PRR!  I could find nothing wrong with the cap and resistor.  I tried a 10uF cap and the same resistor (and moved some V1 wiring around a bit to protect the grids), and now the hum is gone!  Mystery whether it was the cap or just some wondering wires  :dontknow:

  Appreciate the help! 

 

Offline HotBluePlates

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 13127
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2012, 08:04:32 pm »
Hi, I tried a 3.3uF capacitor in my 5f6a, in place of the 220uF cap.  Now I'm getting a large increase in hum which is present with nothing plugged in ...

... I tried a 10uF cap and the same resistor (and moved some V1 wiring around a bit to protect the grids), and now the hum is gone!  Mystery whether it was the cap ...

Yes, the larger cap was masking/eliminating hum. More in a moment...

+1 tubenit

This cap have nothing to do with hum .

It does, but not in the way you might realize at first.

Schoolie: you might have had some lead dress issues, however, doesn't 220-250uF seem like a rediculously large value for a cathode bypass? If you ignore the resistance looking into the cathode of the first stage, 220uF and 820Ω have a -3dB point below 1Hz. Yes, the Bassman was originally intended to be a bass amp, but isn't that overkill?

The low E on a guitar is around 80Hz, so the electric bass has a low E around 40Hz. That puts 60Hz heater hum right in the range intended to be amplified. The sure way to keep the hum out is to use d.c. heater power, but that's expensive and un-tweed-Fenderlike.

You might have meticulous heater wiring and lead dress, yet still get hum in the first tube stage. Why? There is a leakage current from the heater to the cathode through the heater insulation inside the cathode sleeve. This insulation needs to keep the heater electrically isolated from the cathode, yet in intimate thermal contact in order to heat the cathode and cause the tube to have proper emission.

Not all companies and all tube samples have excellent heater-to-cathode insulation and construction, and therefore exhibit varying degrees of heater-to-cathode leakage. The leakage current (which amounts to a 60Hz current) then induces hum directly into that tube stage. If the stage is V1, then it is amplified by the rest of the amplifier's gain.

Fender's first solution to this problem was to use a 12AY7. If you look at the early data sheets, the biggest selling point of a 12AY7 is the claims of low noise and hum and special design for low-level amplifier stages. Since gain is between that of the 12AU7 and 12AT7, a 12AT7 could have been just as easily used for the input stage instead, except for the claimed low hum characteristic.

To hedge the bet of the choice of input tube type, Fender then used an over-sized cathode bypass cap to ensure low hum.

You could look at the heater, heater-cathode insulation, and cathode as a capacitor (two conductors separated by an insulator). You could also look at the heater-to-cathode leakage as a cap that may pass some amount of hum from heater to cathode. If hum is passed, you'd like to short that to ground to prevent it from mixing with your intended amplified signal.

You can make a voltage divider with a pair of resistors, but you can also make a voltage divider that works only with a.c. by using a pair of capacitors. If you want the divided signal to be very small, the grounded cap should have a very low impedance at the frequency of interest, which happens when that cap is very large. We can imagine the capacitance from heater-to-cathode is small (couple-pF range), so an enormous 220-250uF cap would make a good-quality short circuit, and make the cap-based voltage divider reduce hum to the minimum amount.

So you'll see that the big cap is there to reduce hum due to what could be called a "tube defect". The problem is all tubes exhibit the defect, but the really good ones have such a minimal amount of leakage as to not cause any noticeable hum. It is possible, though, for the leakage to worsen over time, and it varies a lot with even individual tubes from a manufacturer.

So, if you're an amp builder it's much cheaper to include the large cap to ensure you kill any possible hum from leakage, and this choice costs less than making a d.c. heater supply. You'll also see that if you are unlucky and have a tube that hums due to leakage, and reduce the value of that bypass cap, that you reduce its ability to eliminate the hum due to leakage. It can be maddening to figure out the cause if you swap tubes, and the hum disappears simply because the new tube has less leakage.

Offline schoolie

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 85
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2012, 12:44:40 pm »
Thank you for the background, HBP!  I agree, 220uF is way beyond the value needed to fully bypass.  What puzzles me is why didn't they use the larger cap on any other models?  Maybe because this was their highest gain model, at the time.  It would have been interesting to substitute a 2nd 12ay7 tube, but I only have one.

 My hum problem at V2, that I posted about a few months ago, also seemed to be tube related. When I substituted a JJ ECC83, the amp was very quiet.  I also got a big hiss reduction when I removed the 2x56KOhm carbon comp resistors from the feedback circuit, and replaced with a 3W metal film 27KOhm resistor.

Who needs to build fifty amps?  I can mod this one for the rest of my life and save space :l2:

Offline jeff

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 1238
  • Need input
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2012, 01:33:02 pm »
If you use a big 220uF cap on the cathode for hum but like the sound of a .1 because it has less lows can you essencially get the same effect by using a smaller coupling cap?

So instead of shaving low end by using a smaller bypass cap shave low end by using a smaller coupling cap. Get the same frequency responce as the .1 cap but the hum reducing benefit of using the 220uF. Or do these two caps have very different effects on the circuit and no value of X would result in the exact same responce?
« Last Edit: October 08, 2012, 01:49:04 pm by jeff »

Offline HotBluePlates

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 13127
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2012, 04:23:57 pm »
What puzzles me is why didn't they use the larger cap on any other models?  Maybe because this was their highest gain model, at the time. 

No, it was a bass amp!

We only think of how we use the amp now, but the Bassman was intended to be paired with Fender's new electric bass. Since the amp needed response down in the range of 60Hz hum, they had to take extra measures to get rid of the hum. But Fender didn't use brute-force methods that other, more expensive products might, because that would raise the selling price and reduce sales/profits.

Besides, if you play a Bassman or old Marshall, the super-huge bypass cap makes the stage sound like mud.

Offline jeff

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 1238
  • Need input
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #10 on: October 09, 2012, 05:11:42 pm »
Besides, if you play a Bassman or old Marshall, the super-huge bypass cap makes the stage sound like mud.
Can you get rid of that mud by using a smaller coupling cap instead of using a smaller cathode bypass cap?
 
Does:  Bigger bypass cap + smaller coupling cap = best of both worlds?
        (no hum, added mud)    (removes mud)

 I'm not asking for an exact value for X, but is lowering the bypass cap essencially doing the same thing as lowering the coupling cap as far as frequency responce goes?(above schematic)
« Last Edit: October 09, 2012, 05:28:44 pm by jeff »

Offline schoolie

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 85
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #11 on: October 09, 2012, 05:43:05 pm »
Besides, if you play a Bassman or old Marshall, the super-huge bypass cap makes the stage sound like mud.
Can you get rid of that mud by using a smaller coupling cap instead of using a smaller cathode bypass cap?
 
Does:  Bigger bypass cap + smaller coupling cap = best of both worlds?
        (no hum, added mud)    (removes mud)

 I'm not asking for an exact value for X, but is lowering the bypass cap essencially doing the same thing as lowering the coupling cap as far as frequency responce goes?(above schematic)


One suggestion for reducing bass is to replace the 0.1uF coupling caps to the power tubes with 0.022uF caps.  I'm not sure about lowering the preamp coupling cap values.

Offline schoolie

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 85
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #12 on: October 09, 2012, 06:10:43 pm »
What puzzles me is why didn't they use the larger cap on any other models?  Maybe because this was their highest gain model, at the time. 

No, it was a bass amp!


Sorry, what I meant is that the  later Bassman circuits  split the cathodes and used smaller, 25uF resistors with 7025 tubes.  Did those designs have more V1 hum?  Would I be better off splitting the V1 cathodes?

Offline jeff

  • Level 3
  • ***
  • Posts: 1238
  • Need input
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #13 on: October 09, 2012, 06:51:10 pm »
One suggestion for reducing bass is to replace the 0.1uF coupling caps to the power tubes with 0.022uF caps.  I'm not sure about lowering the preamp coupling cap values.

 I see what you're saying. I was looking at it like this, If you use the smaller bypass cap on the first stage to cut mud maybe a smaller coupling cap on the first stage would more closely simulate this. By lowering the PI caps you're passing the mud to each preamp stage and the PI then fitlering it out before the power tubes.
 Also, we were talking about IM distortion a while back and it seems to me if you trim the mud first you might get less IM distortion than sending the mud to each stage and possibly geting more IMD from each stage, then trimming the low end.  

IDK just a thought
  Jeff
« Last Edit: October 09, 2012, 06:53:22 pm by jeff »

Offline schoolie

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 85
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #14 on: October 09, 2012, 07:06:32 pm »
I see what you're saying. I was looking at it like this, If you use the smaller bypass cap on the first stage to cut mud maybe a smaller coupling cap on the first stage would more closely simulate this. By lowering the PI caps you're passing the mud to each preamp stage and the PI then fitlering it out before the power tubes.
 Also, we were talking about IM distortion a while back and it seems to me if you trim the mud first you might get less IM distortion than sending the mud to each stage and possibly geting more IMD from each stage, then trimming the low end.  


Thanks Jeff and I agree I want to cut the bass in he preamp rather than the power section.  That's why I liked the idea of reducing the cathode bypass cap.  The 10uF cap sounds better than the 220uF cap, so I'll probably just keep, but it would be interesting to try 0.01uF coupling caps from V1.

Offline HotBluePlates

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 13127
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #15 on: October 10, 2012, 06:36:23 am »
You're all correct. You could reduce the ypass cap to reduce mud, or shave coupling cap values.

Remember though that if you use tubes with little-no heater-to-cathode leakage, you don't need the massive bypass cap. It was there as insurance, so that any tube would perform well in V1 with little apparent hum.

Same goes for the plate-to-plate cap at the phase inverter of tweed Bassman amps; it was there to kill oscillation due to long leads to the output tube grids. But not all amps exhibit the oscillation. Instead, it is a production expedient, so that all amps perform as intended.

Offline schoolie

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 85
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2012, 12:40:16 pm »
Epilogue:

  I traced the hum to the 270K mixer resistors.  I pulled them apart a bit and the hum disappeared.  It appears that lowering the value of the V1 bypass cap increased the effect of the crosstalk between the two channels?    I also put a 6072A in V1, but that had no effect on the hum.

Offline HotBluePlates

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 13127
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2012, 06:10:11 pm »
It appears that lowering the value of the V1 bypass cap increased the effect of the crosstalk between the two channels?

I suppose that's possible, but it seems like the cap would have to be very much smaller than what you used for that to happen.

The bypass cap bypasses the a.c. around the cathode resistor, instead of flowing through it. That normally increases gain, because an unbypassed cathode resistor also generates local negative feedback. You make the bypass cap bigger to give the impression of more bass, because it becomes an effective bypass at a lower frequency as the cap gets bigger.

So if the cap were very small (~0.5uF or less), there is significant low-end in the guitar range that flows through the cathode resistor instead of being bypassed. If two channels share a cathode resistor, there is the chance of crosstalk between the channels.

But in general, once you're down to ~5-10uF, you're bypassing the resistor enough to boost all of the guitar range. Maybe the combination of smallish cathode resistor and smallish bypass cap was just enough to not bypass hum components.
« Last Edit: October 18, 2012, 10:19:24 pm by HotBluePlates »

Offline tubenit

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 10274
  • Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all!
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Lower V1 bypass cap value increases hum?
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2012, 07:46:35 pm »
Quote
I traced the hum to the 270K mixer resistors.  I pulled them apart a bit and the hum disappeared
.

Thanks for sharing the resolution. 

with respect, Tubenit

 


Choose a link from the
Hoffman Amplifiers parts catalog
Mobile Device
Catalog Link
Yard Sale
Discontinued
Misc. Hardware
What's New Board Building
 Parts
Amp trim
Handles
Lamps
Diodes
Hoffman Turret
 Boards
Channel
Switching
Resistors Fender Eyelet
 Boards
Screws/Nuts
Washers
Jacks/Plugs
Connectors
Misc Eyelet
Boards
Tools
Capacitors Custom Boards
Tubes
Valves
Pots
Knobs
Fuses/Cords Chassis
Tube
Sockets
Switches Wire
Cable


Handy Links
Tube Amp Library
Tube Amp
Schematics library
Design a custom Eyelet or
Turret Board
DIY Layout Creator
File analyzer program
DIY Layout Creator
File library
Transformer Wiring
Diagrams
Hoffmanamps
Facebook page
Hoffman Amplifiers
Discount Program


password