Welcome To the Hoffman Amplifiers Forum

September 07, 2025, 02:53:20 pm
guest image
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
-User Name
-Password



Hoffman Amps Forum image Author Topic: Princeton Reverb Harsh  (Read 4571 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline plexi50

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4649
  • Tube Tone
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Princeton Reverb Harsh
« on: November 06, 2012, 06:34:45 pm »
This is a princeton reverb clone i build last month. The reverb itself is to harsh and the decay is to long. There is no 10pf cap on the 3.3M reverb r. I left it off for that reason. I didnt want an overly bright reverb. Smooth and full but not to surfish. I am using a 1959 12AT7. I had tried several different reverb tanks before ordering the original 4AB fender tank for the princeton reverb. Hell i have an old hammond organ tank that sounds better than the 4AB belton made in korea. Why? What happens if i reduce the 3.3M to 2.2M ?

I have a thick cardboard on the bottom of the tank and the tank is even turned upside down. No change

Offline Willabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 10524
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2012, 07:51:56 pm »
What happens if i reduce the 3.3M to 2.2M?

You will get more dry signal.

You can put a small (pF) from the 12AT7 plate to the cathode. Might kill some of the high end harshness.


                Brad      :icon_biggrin:

Offline plexi50

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4649
  • Tube Tone
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2012, 07:56:37 pm »
Is more dry signal to be interpeted as less surf and a smoother reverb tone?

Offline Willabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 10524
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2012, 08:00:56 pm »
If you have more dry than the dry to verb mix is different than what you have now. Try it and see if you like it.


                Brad     :icon_biggrin:

Offline plexi50

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4649
  • Tube Tone
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2012, 08:52:56 pm »
Changing 3.3M now to 2.2M. I am now also using a 12AT7 in both send and return. Sounds much better but want to try 2.2M

Offline plexi50

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4649
  • Tube Tone
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2012, 09:25:37 pm »
Nay on the 2.2M. New question:
How can i get a tad deeper reverb tone. Higher bypass cap value on the send or return?

Offline phsyconoodler

  • SMG
  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4679
  • honey badger don't give a ****
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2012, 09:38:45 pm »
I would try the bypass cap values for sure,but keep in mind the gain will increase a bit too.
 Sometimes using a thicker reverb bag,or one lined with soft cotton or rayon,makes quite a difference.Also a small,thin piece of foam on the underside of the tank to keep the springs from hitting the metal of the tank and maybe a bit to keep the springs from hitting the cardboard.
  And using a bit of silicone seal on the transducers themselves to keep them from moving around.The newer tanks are all over the place in my experience;some sound great and some are kind of metallic sounding.The Gibbs tanks are awesome for the most part.
Honey badger don't give a ****

Offline Willabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 10524
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2012, 09:56:30 pm »
Try a 12AU7 for the reverb driver tube.


                Brad      :icon_biggrin:

Offline HotBluePlates

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 13127
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2012, 09:57:24 pm »
How can i get a tad deeper reverb tone. Higher bypass cap value on the send or return?

Make the 500pF cap a little bigger. 0.01uF should answer whether that does the trick for you.

Add a cap to ground from the grid of the recovery stage. Start with small-pF caps (50-250pF) and experiment. This will shave highs.

Keep the 10pF cap across the 3.3MΩ. This brings back a little treble to the dry signal only.

Try a different tank. I like the 9AB2C1B medium delay "6 spring" tank (it's really 6 spring connected to form 3 delay lines). I tried that tank in the Accutronics era, not the Belton/Accutronics era.

Offline plexi50

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4649
  • Tube Tone
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2012, 10:35:54 pm »
I have been all over the place with tryng to find a good reverb tank. I bought a Belton 8AB2A1B and it sucks. I bought a Belton (Accutronics) 4AB3C1B and it is terrible. My fault for not checking the decay time (long)

I found my tank while trying the 12AU7 driver. It is a 60's Gibbs (Hammond). I have 4 of them and they all sound good but i hear slight differences between them. One of them is dead spot on smooth and decay rate is faster than all the tanks i have. I dont want any more gain from the reverb so i am leaving the reverb caps alone. I hear from a friend that some of these old Fender reverb tanks are fetching $150.00 and up online. Crazy man. Belton sucks. I have the number to the real accutronics in Carey Illinois (Scott Fletcher) I talked to him a few years ago. They are still in business but on a smaller scale. He will build you a tank the old fashioned way if you want. I may just be doing that in the near future just to compare. What the heck! Why not. This Korean and Taiwan tanks suck. I mean they really suck. They come apart,the springs snap off easily. Ive seen 3 of them in the VOX AC30 CC2 that were in pieces when removed. Crazy man. The Gibbs tank sounds fantastic. No delusion tonight. Happy dance!  :worthy1: :worthy1: :worthy1:
« Last Edit: November 07, 2012, 08:05:42 am by plexi50 »

Offline carausius

  • Level 1
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #10 on: November 08, 2012, 07:25:19 pm »
Have you tried the MOD tanks, a new one I bought recently sounds much better than the tank I have in my '72 Twin Reverb.

Offline Willabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Level 5
  • ******
  • Posts: 10524
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #11 on: November 09, 2012, 09:46:25 am »
Plexi, did you try the 12AU7 for the verb driver tube? If so how did it sound?

It's supposed to take the deep surf out but still leave a very nice verb.


                  Brad     :icon_biggrin:    
« Last Edit: November 09, 2012, 09:59:16 am by Willabe »

Offline plexi50

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4649
  • Tube Tone
Hoffman Amps Forum image
Re: Princeton Reverb Harsh
« Reply #12 on: November 09, 2012, 02:29:31 pm »
Willabe i did try a 12AU7 reverb driver and it sounds the best in taming that overkill splashy tone. I like it 100% better

No i have not tried the MOD tanks. Maybe in the future. Good to know

 


Choose a link from the
Hoffman Amplifiers parts catalog
Mobile Device
Catalog Link
Yard Sale
Discontinued
Misc. Hardware
What's New Board Building
 Parts
Amp trim
Handles
Lamps
Diodes
Hoffman Turret
 Boards
Channel
Switching
Resistors Fender Eyelet
 Boards
Screws/Nuts
Washers
Jacks/Plugs
Connectors
Misc Eyelet
Boards
Tools
Capacitors Custom Boards
Tubes
Valves
Pots
Knobs
Fuses/Cords Chassis
Tube
Sockets
Switches Wire
Cable


Handy Links
Tube Amp Library
Tube Amp
Schematics library
Design a custom Eyelet or
Turret Board
DIY Layout Creator
File analyzer program
DIY Layout Creator
File library
Transformer Wiring
Diagrams
Hoffmanamps
Facebook page
Hoffman Amplifiers
Discount Program