Look at the 6G16 Vibroverb schematic.
The trem circuit has 2 stages: the oscillator and cathode follower. Between the cathode follower output and the Intensity pot, there is a 470k resistor and 0.1uF cap to gorund, then another 0.1uF cap to the Intensity pot.
The 470k resistor and 0.1uF cap to ground form a voltage divider, before you even get to the Intensity pot. In the 6G11 Vibrolux, these parts are 220k and a 0.05uF from Intensity pot wiper to ground. These items are not present in the Traynor bias-vary tremolo circuit (to be fair, the YSR-1 I looked at also uses EL34's, which would be easier to trem than 6L6's).
To be fair, the voltage divider serves a purpose. In the AA1164 Princeton Reverb, there's a series 1M, then a 0.02uF to ground, then a series 0.1uF then the Intensity pot. 1MΩ and 0.02uF are -3dB at 7.9Hz, which dumps any noise that's a higher frequency than the actual trem signal. 1M and 0.1uF are -3dB at 1.6Hz, so there is some loss of trem signal, but not too much. If you're really concerned, you bump up that 0.1uF cap.
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see any big differences in the bias-vary trem used on the 6G16 Vibroverb and the 6G11 Vibrolux, outside of placement of the cap to ground (the different values result in a -3dB point of ~14Hz, which should give a stronger trem than the Vibroverb). You can try axing those parts, a la Traynor and see if you get excessive noise from the oscillator.
Also, I've never personally had a problem with too little trem in any Princeton or Princeton Reverb. I should probably caveat that by saying the only ones I messed with were black- and silver-face models rather than new builds.