Then probably no resistor needed.
Why use a choke at all? Because a choke will reduce a.c. ripple while presenting a fairly small d.c. resistance, resulting in less voltage drop especially in the face of changing current.
So why care about that? Because the output tube current varies more with screen voltage than it does with plate voltage, so to some degree your amp's output power depends on a solid, unvarying screen voltage. This is the real reason why most old amps use either a low-value screen resistor or none at all, so screen voltage doesn't drop with increased screen current and result in lowered max output power (of course there are exceptions, where the resistor is protection for the screen).
So amps use a choke to feed the screen power supply node to reduce ripple and potential hum in the output stage (the screen can also be used as a low-mu input).
The inductive reactance of a choke is 2*pi*f*L, with L in henries. Assume f=120Hz due to a full-wave rectifier and U.S. 60Hz wall voltage.
So at 120Hz a 4H choke has a reactance of a bit over 3kΩ. A 20uF cap has a reactance at the same frequency of about 66Ω, so ripple sees a voltage divider for a.c. giving a 45:1 reduction of ripple. The d.c. resistance of the choke will be small compared to its 3kΩ reactance, minimizing the voltage drop between the plate and screen nodes.
So why did you feel the need for an added resistor? I think it will be hard to get materially better ripple reduction over a 4H choke using a resistor without a potentially significant voltage drop. Also, screen current varies with output signal (more than the preamp stage, but less than the output tube plates), so you might get some added power compression.
If you want that effect, you could just as easily do it with bigger screen resistors (I think Tubenit has used up to 3kΩ screen resistors before).