Well comparing valves proves to be an Apples versus Oranges minefield, however!
Clean Channel with Anderson H3 humbucker, volume and tone dimed.
Tone stack set to Bass 5/10, Mid 5/10, Treble 5/10, Bright switch on. No Mods switched in.
Running preamp at the very early stages of saturation, then adjusting the PI send till it is just beginning to saturate and then running the PA wide open, we get this;
http://soundcloud.com/glennjeff/comparison-el84-vs-6l64 Bars of 4/4 with EL84's then same phrase with 6L6's, spliced to be seamless.
The 6L6's actually have about 2dB less gain than the EL84's so a sound file comparison is a tiny bit incorrect. The 6V6's have a bit less gain even still, about 3.5dB down from the EL84's. That means the PI has to work harder to get them at the same volume, or even harder still to drive the big bottles to their full power. Starting to wonder about the relevance of PPICF's to this testing procedure. (PPICF's could be MOSFETS).
BOTTOM LINE.
The EL84 have a more trebly, brassy sort of tone and get to their limit with less drive.
The 6L6's are smoother, can be driven harder and of course produce about twice the power of EL84's.
For the type of music that this soundclip is representative of I prefer the EL84's on the recording, standing in the room with earplugs in, I prefer the 6L6's
OK, same preamp and Pi drive settings, this time comparing 6V6 with 6L6
http://soundcloud.com/glennjeff/comparison-6v6-vs-6l64 Bars of 4/4 with 6V6's then same phrase with 6L6's, spliced to be seamless.
Very hard to hear the difference with an mp3, but the 6V6 is even smoother than the 6L6, but once again, do the drive parameters allow a fair comparison.
(NOTE: I am reading dB's from my recording software's VU meters, I think this would be voltage not power so not a great deal of difference (1 to 1.5 dB power wise), although I found this quite noticeable)