I just read some information from Gerald Webers book about whether your amp needs the stand by switch or not. ...
Merlin presents some counter-arguments re: standby switches on
this page. [
Alerich was faster]
I don't "have a dog in the fight." Standby or no, either way is fine by me.
The consensus we generally reached on this forum was that warnings of dire consequences if you don't have a standby switch are somewhat misapplied information from transmitting tube practice. That is, information which applied to transmitting tubes (and their very high supply voltages) was logically applied to receiving tubes (same class of tubes used in guitar amps) and their much lower supply voltages, but failed to recognize the lower-voltage environment doesn't present the same risks to the tubes.
So it's not critical to include a standby switch, though Weber's writing my lead you to conclude that. But it also won't harm anything if you choose to include one (I believe Merlin's warning about cathode interface is unlikely to manifest itself unless you leave an amp on but in standby for weeks on end).
I've been critical of Gerald Weber's books in the past. They helped me enormously when I didn't know anything and was starting to learn. However, once I did learn some fundamentals of electronics (away from an amp focus) and read some original sources on tube technology, I found Weber had some incomplete explanations, an occasional wild/baseless theory, and a heaping helping of marketing geared toward slavish copying of tweed designs & build process (naturally, because Weber sold exact tweed copies at the time).
Weber has a gift for conveying amp concepts to an audience with a limited technical background is a readable way. I recommend also referring to some old tube books as original sources for fact-checking as you get deeper into this stuff (a good idea for anything, really). And now, thanks to sites like
Pete Millett's site, the old books are more readily available than they have been in the past few decades.