Now the tinkering part..
... The 5e9a's trem is very subtle ... I am trying to either strengthen or replace the trem in my 5e9a.
It shouldn't be subtle. The real Tremolux I owned had very deep, swampy trem.
Compare just the trem oscillator and cathode follower of the
5E9 and 5G9.
Notice there are a couple of differences in the oscillator itself: Plate load is 220kΩ (5E9) vs. 100kΩ (5G9), and cathode resistor is 3.3kΩ (5E9) vs. 1.5kΩ (5G9).
So you might try switching one or both of those resistors to 5G9 values. You could even go as far as using an LED in place of the cathode resistor & bypass cap (Sluckey knows better than me which diodes work well here).
Another spot which could boost trem in the 5E9: There is a 100kΩ resistor bridging 2 lugs of the Depth pot; you could try incrementally lowering this (maybe 56kΩ first, then trying 33kΩ, etc)
The 5E9 point of injection at the paraphrase inverter shared cathode resistor should only require a few volts of trem signal to completely swamp all drive to the output tubes. In other words, a trem signal with peaks about as-big as the idle bias across that resistor. By comparison, the 5G9 needs a trem signal on the order of 28v peak to do the same thing (an order of magnitude greater), because it's overcoming output tube bias instead of preamp tube bias. So there is no way a properly set-up 5E9 should have weaker trem than a 5G9; and therefore it seems a step in the wrong direction to inject trem at the output tube grids if stronger trem is what is desired.