... I have a couple questions about the basic AA764 schematic which I believe will help me in my 'design' phase here. The way I am reading the schematic is that They have taken their vibrato circuit and added it at the non-inverting output of the second half of the 12AX7 ...
Don't look at it that way.

Instead, notice the AA764 VibroChamp has the cathodes of the 2nd 12AX7 gain stage (let's call this the "main channel" path) and the 2nd half of the trem circuit (the buffer) tied together. Now when the buffer pulls a varying cathode current through the Intensity pot, the resulting varying voltage also appears at the other tube's cathode. That varies the bias of that 2nd gain stage of the "main channel" which results in tremolo.
... Garnet appears to put both the reverb and the vibrato on the Phase inverting output of the 12AX7. ...
Don't look at it that way.

Garnet is applying the trem and reverb to the grid of the output tube. As it happens, the dry signal is also being applied to the grid of the output tube.
... trying to wrap my head around the 1 Tube Reverb layout/schem that Tubenit gave us ...
So you're considering using Tubenit's 1-tube reverb. You're also thinking about implementing tremolo the way the VibroChamp does. Should you?
- The downside of the Garnet plan from the G15TR is it uses 3 triodes for the reverb, or a tube-and-a-half.
- The upside of the Garnet plan from the G15TR is it uses 1 triode for the tremolo instead of the VibrChamp's 2 triodes, because trem is applied at a high-impedance point at the output tube's grid, so it doesn't need the buffer stage to apply trem to a low-impedance point as in the VibroChamp.
Garnet's plan is 3 triodes + 1 triode = 2 dual-triodes, while the path you're considering appears to be 2 triodes + 2 triodes = 2 dual triodes.
Since it seems like a wash, I'd highly recommend simply copying Garnet's plan in its entirety. It's trivial to use a 6V6 instead of the indicated 6L6 if you choose.
The preamps are identical,
* although Garnet failed to list a value for the resistor-to-ground in the tone stack. You have a very large chassis, and could replace that resistor with a pot to have a Mid control for your amp as was done with Fender's larger amps.
If you need help selecting power & output transformers, that should be no problem once your desired output tube is known.
4.) the Garnet schematic is giving their Reverb Tranny 300V, so I would pull DC off the appropriate spot on my DC leg there for whatever the Hoffman reverb tranny requires right?
Yes, although copying the Garnet plan in its entirety will eliminate this as something to figure out. Hoffman sells the stock Fender Reverb transformer, which will work just fine with the Garnet circuit.
... I like the idea of a reverb control with a separate dwell control ...
Garnet has a 1MΩ to ground right before the reverb transformer; use a 1MΩ pot there, wired as a volume control. Dwell control done!
*: There is a slight difference in the effective gain of the output tube & 2nd gain stage due to the feedback loop values. However, Garnet is quite close to, but a little bit less than, Fender's amount of feedback.