> just because an amp is working after being built doesn’t mean its done or performing optimally and to embrace this aspect.
Say I write a song. Is it "optimally finished"?
Even if you don't know the process from write to first demo to "finished" track, all of us can think of records that were OK, then later covers (or self-covers) improved them.
Clapton screams "LAYLA!", yawn, Eric wants pussy. The producer was not satisfied and added the piano movement that the studio gofer stole from his girlfriend with scrap Eric-wails over. Now an icon of his work. And THEN, couple decades and 6 pounds of smack later, he took Layla as a waltz pace, contemplative, and that worked real well also. (Let's hope your amp does not need THAT much aging.)
The Dead released a 3-min 45 called Dark Star. Sank like a stone. They played it longer live. Worked on it off/on for 26 years until Jerry left. It's been said it never stops. Certainly changes each time. (Like bringing your parts-stash and iron to every gig, modifying while you play?)
Dylan's "..Watchtower" is perhaps more optimal by Hendrix. And his "Tambourine Man" was re-worked by the Byrds. Sometimes a song just needs a slight re-word: "There's a bathroom on the right", "This is the dawning of the Age of Asparagus."