I think I like the idea of experimenting better. Besides I have no idea what an old Fender Champ is supposed to sound like. :D
I was actually experimenting yesterday with simulating different tone control circuits before and after the 2nd gain stage, and I think I have a concept that might work pretty well. I'll see if I have time to present my idea with some frequency curves later today.
Tone controls after the 2nd gain stage would be sensitive to the power tube. The tube's grid behaves like a capacitor to cathode/ground (and its own plate to some extent). That's why master volume controls directly feeding the poweramp reduce treble, you put resistance in series with a load that demands more current at treble frequencies than bass.
This effect is smaller in preamp tubes than output tubes. Not only treble loss but also variations between each tube you use would be less, if you keep it between the 1st and 2nd stage, not after the 2nd.
I built the AX84 Lead 2 preamp (usually feeds the phase inverter of a push-pull amp) with single-ended output. It has way too much treble with a 6V6... too little with a 6L6. I love the tone with a single, vintage 6CA7 I happen to have. Good thing I'm not pushing it hard because I won't be able to afford (or even find) an exact replacement for that tube!
People talk about differences in sound between tubes but I'm not even pushing its limits, this is mostly from interaction of the tone/volume controls with the tube. And the input capacitance and gain (Miller capacitance) behavior of these tubes don't even look different on paper, it's just hooked up in a way that the effect is significant so differences are also significant.
All of this is interesting, but a tone control earlier in the circuit will be more predictable and swapping tubes isn't the cheapest way to fine-tune your sound!