How were the different values determined? Well, from the data sheets! In particular, I used a
graphical method outlined by York (Chapter 3), and shown in various places in
RDH4.
Method:
A d.c. loadline for 100kΩ was plotted (Red line) on each tube's characteristic curves along with a line (Green line) for the 1.5kΩ cathode resistor. The crossing of these lines indicates the D.C. Operating Point of plate voltage and plate current.
Where characteristic curves were available, a vertical was erected at the plate current of the D.C. Operating Point, and values of Mu, Gm (transconductance), and rp (internal plate resistance) were read directly.
Where characteristic curves were not available, rp was found by plotting a tangent to the "grid bias curve" at the D.C. Operating Point (Orange line). In most cases, an actual curve was not present, and the line is tangent to the nearest actual grid bias curve.
Mu was graphically calculated by laying out approximately equal-changes of grid voltage while keeping plate current fixed (a horizontal Purple line) and noting the corresponding change of plate voltage. ∆ Plate Volts / ∆ Grid Volts = Mu.
Gm was graphically calculated by estimating an equal-change of grid voltage while keeping plate voltage constant (a vertical Pink line) and noting the corresponding change of plate current. ∆ Plate Current / ∆ Grid Volts = Gm.
Sometimes Mu or Gm was calculated rather than obtained graphically. Given rp and one of the other quantities, the third can be found from Mu = Gm x rp.
Given Mu, Gm and rp based on the actual D.C. Operating Point imposed by the circuit, Voltage Gain was calculated using the method
demonstrated by Aiken and in RDH4.
Tube capacitances were taken from the relevant data sheet, using the "With Shield" case, if given. This seemed a good middle ground, as cable and stray wiring capacitances would erode the bandwidth of the tube (but are specific to build implementation). NOTE: while most data sheets mirror the same values of capacitance, some do not.
RFT's 6SL7 claims lower capacitance than
RCA's 6SL7; in this case the higher-pF values were used.