I had another go at checking the MOV substitute clone a few months ago and updated my Maggie vibrato doc (
https://www.dalmura.com.au/static/Magnatone%20vibrato%20design.pdf).
I could only purchase a few different MOV values to test (Littlefuse ZA V08, V39 and V82), and configured a V-I curve to closely match a real varistor VI curve. However my VI curve is a smoothed plot from 15 spot measurements so only subtly identifies the regions in between the MOV part voltages where the curve departs from the real varistor characteristic.
A spectrum analyser can more easily identify differences between the clone and the real deal by assessment of the vibrato induced sidebands of a tone being passed. I came to a view that a clone with a MOV voltage that is centred on the idle operating point is likely to provide a closer alignment of clone to real response. The varistor idle point in my 213 clone was about 55V and 0.1mA. My varistor clone had V39 and V82 MOVs, which have 0.1mA operating points below (35V) and above (77V), so the best clone I could configure also used 2x V39 MOVs to get 35V and 70V points at idle as the closest points on either side of 55V. (I couldn't easily get in a V56 or V68 to check). Martin used a V56 as the middle MOV, which should align ok.
Your 410 clone amp should preferably operate at the nominal DC levels on the schematic, and with the same tube types. From the 410 schematic I can see that the 2 series varistors and 180k have about 172V across them so the varistor idle voltage is likely up around 75V.
I don't think there have been any detailed comparisons done in real life - as that would be difficult to set up - but cursory tests indicate acceptable clone performance. So I'd suggest to just go for it, as any tweaking of parts is unlikely to show up noticeable differences.