Hi all,
Read the following article mentioning Marshall Superbass 100 watt amps.
https://www.musicradar.com/news/tom-bukovac-on-his-favourite-guitar-amp-of-all-time-and-why-the-100-watt-version-is-better-than-a-50-wattOf course ‘Better’ is subjective, but with overall volume aside is there any significant difference between the 100 Watt and 50watt Superbass amps that really is audible and not listening with your eyes?
As a guess, i wonder that the noticeable volume difference between a 100watt on 4 vs 50watt on 4 is what makes is sound better, punchier ?
Another guess might be the output transformer being different wattage rating / wire gauge or winds or manufacturer ?
I don’t know
As for headroom, the addition of 2 extra tubes means that on the face of it you would think that can be a bit louder ( not sure how much exactly) at the same on the volume, though i am wondering if the phase inverter responds differently or the feedback amount to the preamp is different ?
Lastly the mention of the lay down power transformer, makes me think that it may be that the PT for the 100watt may be better or worse specked for the job it has to do vs the 50 watt.
One thing to note iin the article is they talk about the clean setting, how they compare at fully cranked I don’t know.
I haven’t studied these amps in detail and have a general familiarity about Marshalls.
So asking the question here rather than a Marshall based forum, not to argue about very specific details of a individual amp with serial number xxxxxxxx rather for more general discussion about design and perhaps component choices, not to find out which is the better amp or can i build an exact replica, FOMO, or Marshall are planning a reissue and seeding the music industry press ;-) etc etc.